Acute respiratory acidosis and alkalosis – A modern quantitative interpretation

  • Andraž Stožer Inštitut za fiziologijo, Medicinska fakulteta, Univerza v Mariboru, Taborska ulica 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenija Center za odprte inovacije in raziskave Univerze v Mariboru, Slomškov trg 15, 2000 Maribor, Slovenija
  • Marjan Slak Rupnik Inštitut za fiziologijo, Medicinska fakulteta, Univerza v Mariboru, Taborska ulica 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenija Center za odprte inovacije in raziskave Univerze v Mariboru, Slomškov trg 15, 2000 Maribor, Slovenija
Keywords: Davenport, Gamble diagram, acid-base disturbance

Abstract

Background: Three different approaches for assessing the acid-base status of a patient exist, i.e. the Boston, Copenhagen, and Stewart´s approach, and they employ different parameters to assess a given acid-base disturbance. Students, researchers, and clinicians are getting confused by heated debates about which of these performs best and by the fact that during their curricula, they typically get acquainted with one of the approaches only, which prevents them to understand sources employing other approaches and to critically evaluate the advantages and drawbacks of each approach. In this paper, the authors introduce and define the basic parameters characterizing each of the approaches and point out differences and similarities between them. Special attention is devoted to how the different approaches assess the degree of change in the concentration of plasma bicarbonate that occurs during primary respiratory changes; proper understanding of these is necessary to correctly interpret chronic respiratory and metabolic acid-base changes.

Conclusion: During acute respiratory acidosis the concentration of bicarbonate rises and during acute respiratory alkalosis it falls, depending on the buffering strength of non-bicarbonate buffers. During acute respiratory acid-base disturbances, buffer base (employed by the Copenhagen approach), apparent and effective strong ion difference, as well as strong ion gap (employed by the Stewart approach) remain unchanged; the anion gap (employed by the Boston and Copenhagen approach) falls during acute respiratory acidosis and rises during acute respiratory alkalosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kellum JA. The modern concept of homeostasis. Minerva anestesiologica. 2002; 68: 3–11.

Deetjen P, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M. Praktische Diagnostik des Säure-Base-Haushalts. Der Anaesthesist 2012; 61: 989–1000.

DuBose TD. Acidos and Alkalosis. In: Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, et al., editors. Harrison´s Principles of Internal Medicine. 17th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008. p. 287–96.

Schwartz WB, Brackett NC, Jr., Cohen JJ. The Reponse of Extracellular Hydrogen Ion Concentration to Graded Degrees of Chronic Hypercapnia: The Physiologic Limits of the Defense of pH. J Clin Invest 1965; 44: 291–301.

Brackett NC, Jr., Cohen JJ, Schwartz WB. Carbon dioxide Titration Curve of Normal Man. Effect of Increasing Degrees of Acute Hypercapnia on Acid-Base Equilibrium The New England journal of medicine 1965; 272: 6–12.

Singer RB, Hastings AB. An Improved Clinical Method for the Estimation of Disturbances of the Acid-Base Balance of Human Blood Medicine 1948; 27: 223–42.

Astrup F, Siggaard-Andersen O, Jorgensen K, Engel K. The Acid Base Metabolism: A New Approach The Lancet 1960; 275: 1035–9.

Siggaard-Andersen O, Fogh-Andersen N. Base excess or buffer base (strong ion difference) as measure of a non-respiratory acid-base disturbance. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Supplementum 1995; 107: 123–8.

Siggaard-Andersen O, Engel K. A New Acid-Base Nomogram an Improved Method for the Calculation of the Relevant Blood Acid-Base Data. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation 1960; 12: 177–86.

Siggaard-Andersen O. The Van Slyke Equation. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation 1977; 37: 15–20.

Stewart PA. Modern quantitative acid-base chemistry. Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology 1983; 61: 1444–61.

Wooten EW. Science review: Quantitative acid-base physiology using the Stewart model. Critical Care 2004; 8: 448–52.

Severinghaus JW. Siggaard-Andersen and the „Great Trans-Atlantic Acid-Base Debate“. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation Supplementum 1993; 214: 99–104.

Kurtz I, Kraut J, Ornekian V, Nguyen MK. Acid-base analysis: a critique of the Stewart and bicarbonate-centered approaches. American Journal of Physiology–Renal Physiology 2008; 294: F1009-F31.

Severinghaus J. Editorial introduction. J Clin Monitor Comput 1991; 7: 274–5.

Severinghaus JW. Acid-Base Balance Nomogram-A Boston-Copenhagen Detente. Anesthesiology 1976; 45: 542–4.

Severinghaus J. Case for standard-base excess as the measure of nonrespiratory acid-base imbalance. J Clin Monitor Comput 1991; 7: 276–7.

Ribarič S. Motnje acidobaznega ravnovesja. In: Ribarič s, editor. Seminarji iz patološke fiziologije. 1. izdaja ed. Ljubljana: Inštitut za patološko fiziologijo, Medicinska fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani; 2008. p. 27–37.

Nefrologija 2007: Obravnava motenj elektrolitskega, vodnega in acidobaznega ravnotežja. Kandus A, Buturović Ponikvar J, Grego K, Bren AF, editors. Ljubljana: Klinični center Ljubljana; 2007.

Wooten EW. Analytic calculation of physiological acid-base parameters in plasma. Journal of Applied Physiolog. 1999; 86: 326–34.

Wooten EW. The standard strong ion difference, standard total titratable base, and their relationship to the Boston compensation rules and the Van Slyke equation for extracellular fluid. J Clin Monit Compu. 2010; 24: 177–88.

Kellum JA. Clinical review: reunification of acid-base physiology. Crit Care 2005; 9: 500–7. Epub 2005/11/10.

Corey HE. Bench-to-bedside review: Fundamental principles of acid-base physiology. Crit Care. 2005; 9: 184–92.

Gamble JL. Chemical anatomy, physiology and pathology of extracellular fluid: a lecture syllabus: Harvard University Press; 1954.

Davenport HW. The ABC of Acid-Base Chemistry: The Elements of Physiological Blood-Gas Chemistry for Medical Students and Physicians: University of Chicago Press; 1974.

Morgan TJ. The Stewart approach—one clinician‘s perspective. The Clinical biochemist Reviews / Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists. 2009; 30: 41–54.

Wooten EW. Calculation of physiological acid-base parameters in multicompartment systems with application to human blood. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2003; 95: 2333–44.

Adrogué HJ, Madias NE. Secondary Responses to Altered Acid-Base Status: The Rules of Engagement. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2010; 21: 920–3.

Madias NE. Renal acidification responses to respiratory acid-base disorders. Journal of nephrology. 2010; 23 Suppl 16:S85–91.

How to Cite
1.
Stožer A, Slak Rupnik M. Acute respiratory acidosis and alkalosis – A modern quantitative interpretation. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 17Jan.2019];83(2). Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1100
Section
Review