Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopause - where we stand?

  • Damir Franić
Keywords: hormone replacement therapy (HRT), randomized clinical trials, postmenopausis, guidelines for HRT


Background: The findings of most relevant randomized clinical studies such as HERS, WHI and MWS, performed in the last decade have shown that hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) users are at increased risk for the development of breast cancer, stroke and pulmonary edema. On the other hand they are at a lower risk for the development of large bowel cancer and for hip and vertebral fractures; the incidences of endometrial cancer and coronary heart disease have not been proved to be significantly affected by HRT. As for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, the findings of these studies differed from those provided by observational studies, it became an imperative to find the causes of these discrepancies. The major criticism of randomized clinical studies was aimed at the inclusion criteria, as the mean women’s age in HERS and in WHI study was 63 years. The women of that age may no longer be healthy, and are particularly exposed to cardiovascular diseases. In all studies the same type of HRT was used, i.e. conjugated equine estrogen alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone acetate. In Europe, this combination is rarely prescribed; we do not prescribe it in Slovenia either. The same type of HRT used in randomized clinical studies was further criticized, the basic idea of HRT being an individual approach to each woman requiring HRT. For rather sensational and often misinterpreted findings of randomized studies, the largest menopause societies worldwide, the International Menopause Society (IMS), the European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) and the North American Menopause Society (NAMS), have revised the guidelines for HRT use in postmenopause. These guidelines have been adopted by the Slovene Menopause Society as well.

Conclusions: The indications for HRT remain to be markedly expressed and severe climacteric symptoms, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, urogenital syndrome and premature menopause. However, the ‘safe’ window regarding the duration of HRT use has disappeared, and so have the terms ‘short-term’ and ‘long-term’ treatment. The only criterion for the duration of HRT use is to constantly assess the benefits and risks for each individual, and to adjust the dose, type and duration of HRT use accordingly.


Download data is not yet available.


Grady D, Rubin SM, Petitti DB, et al. Hormone therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 1016–37.

Barrett-Connor E, Grady D. Hormone replacement therapy, heart disease and other considerations. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19: 55–72.

Panidis D, Rousso D, Kourtis A, et al. Hormone replacement therapy at the threshold of 21st century. Eu J of Obstet & Gynaecol and Reprod Biol 2001; 99: 154–64.

Grodstein F, Manson JE, Colditz GA, et al. A prospective, observational study of postmenopausal hormone therapy and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 933.

Grady D. Postmenopausal hormones – Therapy for symptoms only. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1835–7.

Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women (HERS). JAMA 1998; 280: 872–81.

Grady D, Herrington D, Bittner V, et al. Cardiovascular disease outcomes during 6,8 years of hormone therapy. JAMA 2002; 288: 49–57.

Herrington D, Reboussin D, Brosnihan K, et al. Effects of estrogen replacement on the progression of coronary artery atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 522–9.

Roussow JE, Anserson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 321–33.

Million Women Study Collaborators. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy in the million women study. Lancet 2003; 362: 419–27.

Crosignani PG. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Maturitas 2003; 46: 91–2.

The Women’s Health Initiative Study Group. Design of the Women’s Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. Controlled Clinical Trials 1998; 19: 61–109.

Genazzani AR, Gambacciani M, Van der Mooren MJ, Speroff L, Dören M, Pines A. Critical Comments. Maturitas 2003; 44: 11–8.

Speroff L. WHI estrogen-only arm is cancelled. Maturitas 2004; 48: 3–5.

Vogel RA. The changing view of hormone replacement therapy. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2003; 4: 68–71.

Dören M. Why the Million Women Study is important for European women. Maturitas 2003; 46: 93–4.

Van der Mooren MJ, Franke HR. The Million Women Study: no evidence to change current opinions. Maturitas 2003; 46: 99–100.

Genazzani AR, Gambacciani M. The sound of an International Anti-HRT Herald. Maturitas 2003; 46: 105–6.

Ferguson DJ, Anderson TJ. Morfological evaluation of cell turnover in relation to menstrual cycle in the »restin« human breast. Br J Cancer 1988; 44: 177–81.

Going JJ, Anderson TJ, Battersby S, MacIntyre CC. Proliferative and secretory activity in human breast during natural and artificial menstrual cycles. Am J Pathol 1988; 130: 193–204.

Collaborative group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative analysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet 1997; 350: 1047–59.

Bush TL, Whiteman M, Flaws JD. Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer: Aqualitative review. Obstet Gynacol 2001; 98: 498–508.

Speroff L. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and the risk of breast cancer. Maturitas 1999; 32: 123–9.

NAMS Report. Amended report from NAMS Advisory Panel on Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy. Menopause 2003; 10: 6–12.

Recommendations from an Expert Workshop, Feb. 2004. Practical recommendations for hormone replacement therapy in peri- and postmenopause. Climacteric 2004; 7: 1–7.

Executive Committee of the International Menopause Society. Guidelines for the hormone treatment of women in the menopausal transition and beyond. Climacteric 2004; 7: 8–11.

The North American Menopause Society. Position statement estrogen and progestogen use in peri- and postmenopausal women: September 2003 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2003; 10: 6–12.

Skouby SO. Climacteric medicine: European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) statements on postmenopausal hormonal therapy. Maturitas 2004; 48: 19–25.

Slovensko-hrvatski konsenzus o indikacijama za HNZ. Plitvice 8-10. 5. 2003.

The North American Menopause Society. Treatment of menopause- associated vasomotor symptoms: position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2004; 11: 11–33.

Notelovitz M. The clinical practice impact of the Women’s Health Initiative: political vs. biologic correctness. Maturitas 2003; 44: 3–9.

Beral V, Banks E, Reeves G. Evidence from randomized trials on the long term effects of hormone replacement therapy. Lancet 2002; 360: 942–4.

Warren MP. A comparative review of the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy regimens. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1141–67.

Wright J. Guidelines for the hormone treatment of women in the menopausal transition and beyond. Maturitas 2004; 48: 27–31.

Notelovitz M. Rational hormonal management of the menopause. Gynaecology Forum 2004; 9: 23–7.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Women’s Health Care Physicians. Task force for hormone therapy. Summary of balancing risks and benefits. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1S–129S.

Ettinger B, Barrett-Connor E, Hoq LA, et al. When is it appropriate to prescribe postmenopausal hormone therapy? Menopause 2006; 13: 404–10.

Franić D, Verdenik I, Meden-Vrtovec H, Švab I. Continuation of hormone replacement therapy in Slovenia: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial – 1-year follow-up. Maturitas 2006; 54: 110–18.

How to Cite
Franić D. Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopause - where we stand?. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 30Mar.2020];76(2). Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1651
Review article