Background. Due to restrictions imposed on a clinical freedom, interest for professionalism in healthcare has been getting bigger not only in medicine literature and various mass media but also in teaching and organisation of healthcare. Professionalism stands not only for a medicine’s contract with society, recognition of a physician status, privilege and monopoly but also for a genuine physician’s commitment to professional responsibilities.
Analysis. In 2002 European and American associations approved a document on medical professionalism in the new millenium, so-called Physician Charter. This document includes fundamental principles of professionalism such as altruism, patient autonomy and social justice. In particular, it analyses a physician’s professional competency, honesty with patients, patient confidentiality, appropriate relations with patients, improvements regarding a healthcare quality, healthcare access, just distribution of finite funds, commitment to scientific knowledge, trust maintenance by managing conflicts of interest and a professional responsibility.
Conclusions. Physician’s professionalism means philosophycal and sociological analysis of his/her profession and its position in a society. It includes a concern for improvements of his/ her own scientific knowledge, skills, a genuine ethic interest for an individual patient bearing in mind principles of equality and justice in society. Whether performing an organisational and public work or participating in professional health organizations, physician’s interest for a patient must prevail.
Swick HM. Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Acad Med 2000; 75: 612–6.
Freidson E. Professionalism reborn. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994: 13–29.
Wear D, Castellani B. The development of professionalism: Curriculum matters. Acad Med 2000; 75: 602–11.
Ahronheim JC, Moreno J, Zuckerman C. Ethics in clinical practice. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1994: 11–39.
Percival T. Medical ethics. Reprint 1975. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co., 1927: 65–9.
Rothman DJ. Medical professionalism – focusing on the real issues. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1284–6, 200–1.
Gove PB ed. Webster’s third new international dictionary. Springfield: G&C Merrion Company, 1971: 1811–1.
Anon. Medical professionalism in the new millenium: a physicians’ charter. Lancet 2002; 359: 520–2.
Petch MC. Heart disease, guidelines, regulations, and the law. Heart 2002; 87: 472–9.
Chard J, Lilford R, Gardiner D. Looking beyond the next patient: sociology and modern health care. Lancet 1999; 353: 486–9.
Hart JT. A new kind of doctor: professional autonomy in a public service. Br J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 854–7.
Carey WD. Humanism and professionalism in medicine’s new world order. AJG 1994; 89: 1932–7.
Tanenbaum SJ. Evidence and expertise: the challenge of the outcomes movement to medical professionalism. Acad Med 1999; 74: 757–63.
Wynia MK, Latham SR, Kao AC. Medical professionalism in society. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1612–6.
Cruess SR, Cruess RL. Professionalism must be taught. BMJ 1997; 315: 1674– 7.
Swick HM, Szenas P, Danoff D, Whitcomb ME. Teaching professionalism in undergraduate medical education. JAMA 1999; 282: 830–2.
Reynolds PP. Reaffirming professionalism through the education community. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 609–14.
Cruess RL, Cruess SR. Teaching medicine as a profession in the service of healing. Acad Med 1997; 72: 941–52.
Hensel WA, Dickey NW. Teaching professionalism: Passing the torch. Acad Med 1998; 73: 865–70.
Coller BS, Klotman P, Smith LG. Professing and living the oath: Teaching medicine as a profession. Am J Med 2002; 112: 744–8.
Anon. Maintaining good medical practice. J Roy Coll Phys London 1999; 33: 241–5.
Buetow SA, Roland M. Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care. Quality in Health Care 1999; 8: 184–90.
Casalino LP. The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1147–50.
Freidson E. Professionalism reborn. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994: 196–8.
Straus SE, McAlister FA. Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms. CMAJ 2000; 163: 837–41.
Pellegrino ED, Relman AS. Professional medical associations. JAMA 1999; 282: 984–6.
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal) has the right to transfer the rights, acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.