• Tomaž Benedik Klinični oddelek za abdominalno kirurgijo Kirurška klinika Klinični center Vodnikova 62 1000 Ljubljana
Keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bile ducts lesions, prevention of lesions


Background. After more than decade of routine use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of symptomatic gallbladder stones, the incidence of biliary injuries, which are potentially life threatening and cause prolonged hospitalization and major morbidity, seems to be increased in laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open operation. Injury rate was from some reports 2.5 to 4 times higher than with open operation. There are many proposed classifications of types of biliary injuries.

The most frequent direct causes of laparoscopic biliary injury are misidentification of the common bile duct, cautery injuries to the bile duct and improper application of clips to the cystic duct.

Conclusions. To avoid misidentification of ducts one should conclusively identify cystic duct and artery, the structures to be divide, in every laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To achieve that goal, Calot’s triangle must be dissected free of fat and fibrous – tissue and the lower end of the gallbladder must be dissected of the liver bed. The only two structures entering the gallbladder should be visible – cystic duct and artery. With avoidance of blind application of cautery and clips to control bleeding one should avoid injury of bile duct. Low cautery settings should be used in portal dissections to prevent arc.

With meticulous care in dissection and conclusive identification of cystic duct and artery we can prevent injuries of bile duct, which still have impermissible high incidence. In the article 504 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at the Department of abdominal surgery in BPD in 2002 were analysed. We follow priciples of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There were no biliary injuries reports.


Download data is not yet available.


Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 180: 101–25.

Go PMNYH. Epidemiology of bile duct lesions. EAES Postgraduate Course. Linz: EAES 1999: 43–4.

Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Mattie AS, Lynch JT. Bile duct injuries, 1989–1993. A statewide experience. Arch Surg 1996; 131: 382–8.

Cates JA, Tomkins RK, Busuttil RW et al. Biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 1993; 59: 243–7.

Asbun HJ, Rossi RL, Lowell JA, Munson JL. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism of injury, prevention, and managemment. World J Surg 1993; 17: 547–52.

Robertson AJ, Rela M, Karani J, Steger AC, Benjamin IS, Heaton ND. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy injury: an unusual indication for liver transplantation. Transpl Int 1998; 11: 449–51.

Go PMNYH, Dirksen CD. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Netherlands. Int Surg 1995; 80: 304–6.

Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullaton GM. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 1356–60.

Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, Schwartz JS, Williams SV. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A metaanalysis. Ann Surg 1996; 224(5): 609–20.

Bemard HR, Hartman TW. Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 533–5.

Go PMNYH, Schol FPG, Gouma DJ. Lparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Netherlands. Br J Surg 1993; 178: 229–33.

Ovaska J, Airo I, Haglund C, Kivilaakso T, Plm J, Paakkonen M, Ristkari S, Smitten KV. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Finnish experience. Ann Chir GynaecoI 1996; 85: 208 –11.

Huang X, Feng Y, Huang Z. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystoctomy in China: an analysis of 39238 cases. China Med J 1997; 110: 704–6.

Ihsz M, Hung CM, Regoly-Merei J et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Hungary: a multicentre study of 13833 patients. Eur J Surg 1997; 163: 267–74.

Adamsen S, Hnsen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, Wara P. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 1997; 184(6): 571–8.

Gigot J, Etienne J, Aerts R et al. The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A anonymous multicenter Belgian survey of 65 patients. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 1171–8.

MacFadyen Jr BV, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR. Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United States experience. Surg Endosc 1998;12: 315–21.

Zgraggen K, Wehrli H, Metsger A, Buehler M, Frei E, Klaiber C. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectctomy in Switzerland. A prospective 3year study of 10174 patients. Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1303–10.

Pegan V. Laparoskopska kirurgija v Sloveniji – konservativnost ali preudamost? 3. Kongres endoskopske kirurgije Slovenije z mednarodno udeležbo Rogla 1996; Knjiga abstraktov: l. Ljubljana: Združenje kirurgov Slovenije, 1996.

Bismuth H. Postoperative strictures of the bile duct. In:The biliary tract.V. Blumgart LH ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1982: 209–18.

Stewart L, Way LW. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 130: 1123–8.

Boland GW, Mueller PR, Lee MJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with bile duct injury: Percutaneous management of biliary stricture and associated complications. AJR 1996; 166: 603–7.

Bonnel DH, Liguory CL, Lefebvre JF, Comud FE. Placement of Metallic Stents for Traetment of Postoperative Biliary Strictures: Long-Term Outcome in 25 Patients. AJR 1997; 169: 1517–22.

Vračko J. Sodobna obravnava bolnikov z laparoskopskimi poškodbami žolčevodov, zaznanimi med holecistektomijo. Endoscopic Rev 1996; 1: 73– 8.

Kozarek R, Gannan R, Baerg et al. Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Int Med 1992; 152 :1040–3.

Meyers WC, Club TSS. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1073–8.

Davidoff AM, Papps TN, Murray EA et al. Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg; 1992; 215: 196–202.

Soper NJ, Flye MW, Brunt LM et al. Diagnosis and management of biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 663– 9.

Ferguson CM, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992; 2: 1–7.

Roy AF, Passi RB, Lapointe RW et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Surg 1993; 36: 509–16.

Mouiel J. Principles of safety in lap-cholecystectomy. EAES Postgraduate Course. Linz: EAES, 1999: 45–6.

Soper NJ. Bile duct injury: Can cholangiography help? EAES Postgraduate Course. Linz: EAES 1999: 47–8.

Dubois F, Berthelot G, Levard H. Cholecystectomie par coelioscopie. Presse Med 1989; 18: 980–2.

Reddick EJ, Olsen DO. Laparoscopic laser cholecystoctomy. Surg Endosc 1989; 131–3.

Sekimoto M, Tomita N, Tamura S, Ohsato H, Monden M. New retraction technique to allow better visualization of Calots triangle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1439–41.

Fletcher DR, Hobbs MST, Tan P et al. Complications of cholecystectomy: Risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 449–57.

How to Cite
Benedik T. PRINCIPLES OF SAFETY IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 18Apr.2019];72. Available from: