• Irma Virant Bolnišnica za ginekologijo in porodništvo Kranj Kidričeva 38 4000 Kranj
  • Tomaž Tomaževič Ginekološka klinika Klinični center Šlajmerjeva 3 1525 Ljubljana
Keywords: salpingoscopy, tubal pregnancy, tubal infertility


Background. To confirm the hypothesis that the incidence of pathological changes of the mucosa in the contralateral tube is higher in women with tubal pregnancy than in fertile women. To evaluate a new method for direct assessment of the tubal mucosa, salpingoscopy.

Patients and methods. In the prospective study we enrolled 58 women in the period June 1998–April 2001. The study group consisted of 23 women with tubal pregnancy and 19 infertile women seeking diagnostic laparoscopy. The exclusion criteria was tubal pregnancy that occurred in spite of an inserted intrauterine device or after an in vitro fertilizationembryo transfer (IVF-ET). The control group consisted of 16 fertile women. Laparoscopy was performed in all the enrolled women. Peritubal adhesions were diagnosed laparoscopically, whereas intratubal adhesions were diagnosed by salpingoscopic examination of the ampullary tubal mucosa.

Results. Laparoscopy revealed peritubal adhesions in 31 women: in 43% of women with a history of ectopic pregnancy, in 94% of infertile women, and in 19% of fertile women. On salpingoscopy pathologic changes of the ampullary tubal mucosa were most frequent in infertile women (47.7%), less frequent in women with a history of ectopic pregnancy (26.1%), and the least frequent in fertile women (6.3%). Pearson correlation coefficient yielded a weak correlation between the extensiveness of laparoscopically assessed lesions and salpingoscopically assessed pathology. None of the 13 women with pathologic changes of the ampullary tubal mucosa conceived spontaneously, whereas 43.5% of women with healthy tubal mucosa on salpingoscopy conceived spontaneously. The women with diagnosed pathologic changes of the tubal mucosa were referred for IVF treatment to prevent further ectopic pregnancies.

Conclusions. Salpingoscopy is a useful method in the evaluations tubal functions. Salpingoscopy is beneficial to the women with pathological changes of the tube: by referring them for IVF-ET further tubal pregnancies are avoided. The results of endoscopic tubal surgery can be further improved through a proper selection of patients by salpingoscopy.


Download data is not yet available.


Bronson RA. Tubal pregnancy and infertility. Fertil Steril 1977; 28: 221–1.

Kitchin JD, Wein RM, Nunley WC, Thiagarajah S, Thoronton WN. Ectopic pregnancy: current clinical trends. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 870–0.

Devroey P. Tubal surgery in the era of ART in: Fertility and reproductive medicine. In: Kempers R.D, Cohen J, Haney AF, Younger J. B eds. New York: Elsevier Science 1998, 349–55.

Surrey ES. All hydrosalpinges should be removed prior to IVF-embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: Suppll: 85–5.

Dubbuisson JB, Chapron C. Surgical managenent of female infertility In: Kempers RD, Cohen J, Haney AF, Younger JB eds. New York: Elsevier Science 1998, 349–53.

Mage G, Canis G, Watteiz A, Pouly JL, Mannhes H. Management of distal tubal occlussion. 10th World Congress on In Vitro Fertilisation and Assisted Reproduction, Vancouver Canada. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore, 1997: 1059–61.

De Bruyne F, Putemans P, Boecks W, Brossens I. The clinical value of salpingoskopy in tubal infertility. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 339–40.

Henry-Suchet J, Loffredo V, Tesquier L, Pez JP. Endoscopy of the tube (tuboscopy): its prognostic value for tuboplasties. Acta Europaea Fertilitatis 1985; 16: 139–45.

Vasquez G, Boeckx W, Brosens I. Prospective study of tubal mucosal lesions and fertility in hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1075–8.

De Bruyne F, Puttemans P, Boeckx W, Brosens I. The clinical value of salpingoscopy in tubal infertility. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 339–40.

Heylen SM, Brosens IA, Puttemans PJ. Clinical value and cumulative pregnancy rates following rigid salpingoscopy for infertility. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 2913–6.

Mori T, Mori C, Yamadori F. Tubaloscope. Flexible glassfiber endoscope for intratubal observation. Endoscopy 1970; 4: 226–30.

Cornier E, Feintuch MJ, Bouccara L. La fibrotuboscopie ampullaire (ampulla fibrotuboscopy). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1984; 13: 49–53.

Cornier E. L˘ampullosalpingoscopie per-coelioscopique (Per-celioscopic ampullosalpingoscopy). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1985; 14: 459–66.

Cornier E. Interet pronostique de la tuboscopie peroperatoire (Prognostic advatage of peroperative tuboscopy). Contracept Fertil Sex 1982; 10: 853–6.

Brosens I, Boeckx W, Delattin P, Puttemans PJ, Vasquez G. Salpingoscopy: a new pre-operative diagnostic tool in tubal infertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 768–73.

Brosens I, Puttmans PJ. Double-optic laparoscopy. Salpingoscopy, ovarian cystoscopy and endo-ovarian surgery with the argon laser. Balliere’s Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 3: 595–608.

Puttemans PJ, Brosens I, Delattin Ph, Vasquez G, Boeckx W. Salpingoscopy versus hysterosalpingography in hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 535–840.

Tomaževič T, Kuhelj-Recer J, Ribič-Pucelj M. Mesto endoskopske kirurgije jajcevodov. Endoscopic Rev 1999; 4: 42–2.

Tomaževič T, Ribič-Pucelj M, Vogler A et al. Mesto endoskopske kirurgije pri zdravljenju neplodnosti zaradi distalne okvare jajcevodov. Endoscopic Rev 2003; 8: 3–9.

How to Cite
Virant I, Tomaževič T. SALPINGOSCOPY – A USEFUL TOOL IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN THE TUBE. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 15Sep.2019];72. Available from:
Professional Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)