NERVE SPARING« RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY – PREVENTION OF POST-OPERATIVE URINARY TRACT DYSFUNCTION

  • Matija Barbič Ginekološka klinika Univerzitetni klinični center Ljubljana Šlajmerjeva 3 1000 Ljubljana
  • Stelio Rakar Ginekološka klinika Univerzitetni klinični center Ljubljana Šlajmerjeva 3 1000 Ljubljana
  • Andrea Di Stefano Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital »Vincenzo Cervello« Palermo Italy
  • Alenka Levičnik Ginekološka klinika Univerzitetni klinični center Ljubljana Šlajmerjeva 3 1000 Ljubljana
Keywords: cervical cancer, radical hysterectomy, nerve sparing surgical technique, urinary tract dysfunction

Abstract

Background. Radical hysterectomy is performed on woman with cervical cancer or endometrial cancer that has spread to the cervix.

Aims. To find whether our modified radical hysterectomy represents nerve sparing.

Methods. In 28 patients, modified radical hysterectomy was applied (study group) and the width of the parametria and vaginal cuff were measured. Using a point-counting technique, nerve areal density was determined in cross sections of resected parametria at 0.5 cm (A), 1 cm (B), and 1.5 cm (C) from the cervix. The results were compared with 26 control patients who underwent classic radical hysterectomy. In the study group urodynamic measurements were performed after operation, and correlations with histologic data were calculated. The survival rates and adjuvant treatment were compared between the groups.

Results. Adjuvant treatment was given to 53.57 % in the study and 65.38 % of patients in the control group (P > 0.3). The survival rate after 3 years was 92.85 % in the study and 84.61 % in the control group after more than 5 years. The width of the resected parametria was smaller in the study (mean: right 15.50 mm, left 15.71 mm) compared with the control group (mean: right 22.69 mm; P < 0.013; left 22.96 mm; P < 0.011). The nerve areal density in the lateral part of the right parametrium (C right 6.2 %) was lower in the study than in the control group (C right 9.7 %; P < 0.01). There were several correlations between parametrial width, nerve areal density and urodynamic parameters.

Conclusions. Modified radical hysterectomy is less radical, and apparently also nerve sparing. It does not influence survival rates and does not impair the urinary tract function.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Low JA, Mauger GM, Carmichael JA: The effect of Wertheim

hysterectomy upon bladder and urethra function. Am J Obstet

Gynecol 1981; 139: 826–34.

Seski JC, Dioknu AC: Bladder dysfunction after radical abdominal

hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 128: 643–51.

Ralph G, Tamussino K, Lichtenegger W. Urological complications

following radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Arch Gynecol Obstet 1988; 243: 215–20.

Todo Y, Kuwabara H, Watari H, Ebina Y, Takeda M, Kudo M,

Yamamoto R, Sakuragi N. Urodynamic study on postsurgical

bladder function in cervical cancer treated with systematic

nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;

: 369–75.

Scotti RJ, Bergman A, Bhatia NN, Ostergard DR. Urodynamic

changes in urethrovesical function after radical hysterectomy.

Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 111–20.

Farquarson DI, Shingelton HM, Soong SG, Scanford SP, Levy DS,

Hatch KD. The adverse effect of cervical cancer treatment on

bladder function. Gynecol Oncol 1987; 27: 15–23.

Ralph G, Winter R, Michelitsch L, Tamussino K. Radicality of

parametrial resection and dysfunction of the lower urinary

tract after radical hysterectomy. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 1991; 12:

–30.

Possover M, Stőber S, Plaul K, Schneider A. Identification and

Preservation of the Motoric Innervation of the Bladder in Radical

Hysterectomy Type III. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 79: 154–7.

Possover M, Schneider A. Slow-transit constipation after radical

hysterectomy type III (Anatomic-based explanation and prevention).

Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 847–50.

Possover M, Rheim K, Chiantera V. The »Laparoscopic NeuroNavigation«

– LANN: from a functional cartography of the pelvic

autonomus neurosystem to a new field of laparoscopic surgery.

Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2004; 13: 362–7.

Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Kitamura S.

Dissection of the cardinal ligament in radical hysterectomy for

cervical cancer with emphasise on the lateral ligament. Am J

Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 7–14.

Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Satou N. A new

proposal for radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 62:

–8.

Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Nishikawa Y,

Nakajima T. Radical Hysterectomy: An Anatomical Evaluation

of Parametrial Dissection. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77: 155–63.

Sakuragi N, Todo Y, Kudo M, Yamamoto R, Sato T. A systematic

nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in invasive cervical cancer for

preserving postsurgical bladder function. Int J Gynecol Cancer

; 15: 389–97.

DiStefano AB, Alboni C, Garozzo G, Barbič M, Rakar S, Kobal B,

et al. Nerve contents of the deep part of anterior parametrium:

an anatomic study. In: Abstract of the 15th International Meeting

of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO);

Oct 28 Nov 1; Berlin. Berlin: European Society of Gynaecological

Oncology, 2007.

Incidenca raka v Sloveniji 2005. Ljubljana: Onkološki inštitut

Ljubljana, Register raka za Slovenijo; 2008.

Burghardt E, Pickel H. Local spread and lymph node involvement

in cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 138–45.

Burghardt E, Pickel H, Haas J, Lahousen M. Prognostic factors

and operative treatment of stages IB to IIB cervical cancer. Am

J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 988–96.

Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Scambia G, Greggi S, Cutillo

G, D’Andrea G et al. Lymphatic spread of cervical cancer: an

anatomical and pathological study based on 225 radical hysterectomies

with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy.

Gynecol Oncol 1996; 62: 19–24.

Sironi S, Belloni C, Taccagni GL, Del Maschio A. Carcinoma of

the cervix: Value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement.

Am J Roentgen 1991; 156: 753–6.

Lien HH, Blomlie V, Iversen T, Trope C, Sundford K, Abeler VM.

Clinical stage I carcinoma of the cervix. Value of the MR imaging

in determining invasion into the parametrium. Acta Radiol 1993;

: 130–2.

DeSouza NM, Hawley IC, Schwieso JE, Gilderdale DJ, Soutter WP.

The uterine cervix on in vitro and in vivo MR images: a study

of zonal anatomy and vascularity using an enveloping cervical

coil. Am J Roentgen 1994; 163: 607–12.

Hagen B, Shepherd JH, Jacobs IJ. Parametrial resection for invasive

cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2000; 10: 1–6.

Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, Peters AAW, Kenter GG. A

nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility

in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2001; 11: 180–6.

Published
2018-02-14
How to Cite
1.
Barbič M, Rakar S, Di Stefano A, Levičnik A. NERVE SPARING« RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY – PREVENTION OF POST-OPERATIVE URINARY TRACT DYSFUNCTION. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 14Feb.2018 [cited 22Sep.2019];78. Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2751
Section
Professional Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)