• Marijan Lužnik Oddelek za ginekologijo in porodništvo Splošna bolnišnica Slovenj Gradec Gosposvetska 1 2380 Slovenj Gradec
Keywords: female genital prolapse, mesh, cystocele, rectocele


Background. Use of alloplastic mesh implantates allow a new urogynecologycal surgical techniques achieve a marked improvement in pelvic organ static and pelvic floor function with minimally invasive needle transvaginal intervention like an anterior transobturator mesh (ATOM) and a posterior ischiorectal mesh (PIRM) procedures.

Methods. In three years, between April 2006 and May 2009, we performed one hundred and eightyfour operative corrections of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) with mesh implantates. The eighty-three patients with surgical procedure TVT-O or Monarc as solo intervention indicated by stress urinary incontinence without POP, are not included in this number. In 97 % of mesh operations, Gynemesh 10 × 15 cm was used. For correction of anterior vaginal prolapse with ATOM procedure, Gynemesh was individually trimmed in mesh with 6 free arms for tension-free transobturator application and tension-free apical collar. IVS (Intravaginal sling) 04 Tunneller (Tyco) needle system was used for transobturator application of 6 arms through 4 dermal incisions (2 on right and 2 on left). Minimal anterior median colpotomy was made in two separate parts. For correction of posterior vaginal prolapse with PIRM procedure Gynemesh was trimmed in mesh with 4 free arms and tension-free collar. Two ischiorectal long arms for tension-free application through fossa ischiorectale – right and left, and two short arms for perineal body also on both sides. IVS 02 Tunneller (Tyco) needle system was used for tension-free application of 4 arms through 4 dermal incisions (2 on right and 2 on left) in PIRM.

Results. All 184 procedures were performed relatively safely. In 9 cases of ATOM we had perforation of bladder, in 5 by application of anterior needle, in 3 by application of posterior needle and in one case with pincette when collar was inserted in lateral vesico – vaginal space. In 2 cases of PIRM we had perforation of rectum. In all 11 cases correction was performed during the operation, mesh was kept in place and postoperative course of treatment went without complications. Mean hospitalization time for mesh operation was 4 to 5 days. Short term results, 2 to 3 months after the operation, are very good both for pelvic organ static, and for pelvic function. In 14 cases we had small vaginal erosion in place of upper vaginal incision by ATOM. All erosions were cured spontaneously after removing of unresorptive suture (Etibond 1/0; Ethicon) and/or excision of small denudated mesh part (< 1 mm2) without any anesthesia and vaginal sutures.

Conclusions. New methods and materials allow return of pelvic floor integrity to physiological condition without hysterectomy of otherwise healthy uterus also in state of totally uterine prolapse. Corrections of POP with mesh procedures and without hysterectomy present a minimally invasive surgery with short hospitalization and reconvalescence. Quality of life markedly improved after operation because the preoperative problems were eliminated. Our and foreign experiences on these field1–8 give us a promise for long duration of good results which we also expect for women after needle implanted mesh in ATOM and/or PIRM procedure.9, 10


Download data is not yet available.


Lužnik M. Uporabnost propilenske mrežice pri motnjah funkcije medeničnega dna. In: Kralj B, Denona V, eds. Zbornik 2. kongres

ginekologov in porodničarjev Slovenije z mednarodno udeležbo; 2000 nov 19–22; Portorož. Ljubljana: Združenje ginekologov in

porodničarjev Slovenije; 2000. p. 133.

Petros PE. Vault prolapse II: restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure.

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001; 12: 296–303.

Lužnik M. Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in combination with reconstructive pelvic floor operation. In: Abstract book of the World

congress on gynecological endoscopy, 1st Croatian congress on gynecological endoscopy; 2002 May 15–18; Dubrovnik. Dubrovnik:

Croatian society of gynecological endoscopy; 2002. p. 30.

Lužnik M. Mrežna krpa za korekcijo velike rektokele: prve izkušnje. Zdrav Vestn 2002; 71: 23–6.

Lužnik M. A four-year experience in use of mesh patch for correction of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and pelvic floor dysfunction

(PFD): A vaginal approach. In: Lukanovič A, Tamussino K, eds. Urogynecology today. Joint meeting of Slovene urogynecological

society and Austrian society for urogynecology and pelvic reconstructive surgery, Portorož, September 24–25; 2004. p. 181–2.

Jordaan DJ, Prollius A, Cronje HS, Nel M. Posterior intravaginal sling plasty for vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct

; 17: 326–9.

Lužnik M. Pooperativno ovrednotenje nenapetostnega vaginalnega traku (TVT) 2 do 6 let po posegu: raziskava na osnovi ankete. Zdrav

Vestn 2006; 75: 817–22.

Vardy MD, Brodman M, Olivera CK, Zhou HS, Flisser AJ, Bercik RS. Anterior intravaginal slingplasty tuneller device for stress incontinence

and posterior intravaginal slingplasty for apical vault prolapse: a 2-year prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 104:


Lužnik M. Anterior transobturator mesh (ATOM) and/or posterior ischiorectal mesh (PIRM) for correction of female pelvic organ

prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Gynecol Surg 2007; 4 Suppl 1: S31.

Lužnik M. Needle implanted mesh for correction of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction: anterior transobturator

mesh (ATOM) and/or posterior ischiorectal mesh (PIRM). CD – Abstract Presentations; IUGA 2009 Italy: 34th Annual IUGA Meeting,

Lago di Como, 16–20 June 2009: Abstract No: 424; 276–7.

How to Cite
Lužnik M. A THREE-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH ANTERIOR TRANSOBTURATOR MESH (ATOM) AND POSTERIOR ISCHIORECTAL MESH (PIRM). ZdravVestn [Internet]. 14Feb.2018 [cited 17Sep.2019];78. Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2788