Oral rehabilitation with implant supported overdentures in patients with non-reconstructed segmental mandibulectomy: A report of two cases

  • Rok Zupančič Zobozdravstvo Zupančič d.o.o., Staničeva 4, 1000 Ljubljana
  • Milan Kuhar Center za stomatološko protetiko, Stomatološka klinika, Univerzitetni klinični center, Hrvatski trg 6, 1000 Ljubljana
Keywords: overdenture, implant supported, mandibulectomy, conical crown, milled bar

Abstract

Background: Segmental mandibulectomy is most often performed as part of resection of advanced squamous cell carcinoma, which involves the mandible by extension from intraoral tissues and is usually followed by reconstruction of the mandible. However, not all mandibular defects can be surgically reconstructed, due to local or systemic factors. Oral rehabilitation with conventional removable dentures is often insufficient. In order to provide predictable support and denture retention, especially in the non-reconstructed cases of segmental mandibulectomy, dental implants are indicated.

Case report: The authors describe oral rehabilitation with implant-supported overdenture in two non-reconstructed patients with similar mandibular defect, but different etiology, as well as different denture design and different outcome in terms of success and patient satisfaction. In the first case, the defect was caused by surgical treatment of cancer, which was followed by radiotherapy and prosthodontic treatment with an implant-supported mandibular overdenture anchored with a bar. In another case, the damage was due to a suicide attempt. This was initially followed by the surgical treatment of the injury. Afterwards, the prosthodontic treatment with an implant-supported and conical–crown-anchored mandibular overdenture was performed.

Conclusions: The success of the prosthodontic oral rehabilitation of patients with segmental mandibulectomy depends on many factors. The size of the defect and the condition of the remaining hard and soft tissues, which are affected by radiotherapy, are crucial. The etiology of the defect, the opposing jaw status, maxillomandibular relationships, the consistency of mandibular movement and the denture design play an important role as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Schrag C, Chang YM, Tsai CY, Wei FC. Complete Rehabilitation of the Mandible Following Segmental Resection. Journal of Surgical Oncology 2006; 94: 538–45.

Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG. Mandible reconstruction with microvascular surgery. Semin Surg Oncol 2000; 19: 226–34.

Desjardins RP. Occlusal considerations for the partial mandibulectomy patient. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 41: 308–15.

Mou SH, Chai T, Shiau YY, Wang JS. Fabrication of conventional complete dentures for a left segmental mandibulectomy patient: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 582–5.

Sahin N, Hekimohlu C, Aslan Y. The fabrication of cast metal guidance flange prosthesis for a patient with segmental mandibulectomy: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 217–20.

Didanovic V, Prodnik L, Eberlinc A, Vesnaver A, Ihan Hren N, Kansky A. Three-dimensional models in maxillofacial surgery. Zdrav Vestn 2010; 79: 302–306.

Chaine A, Pitak-Arnnop P, Hivelin M, Dhanuthai K, Bertrand JC, Bertolus C. Postoperative complications of fibular free flaps in mandibular reconstruction: an analysis of 25 consecutive cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108: 488–95.

Gookizadeh A, Emami H, Najafizadeh N, Roayaei M. Clinical evaluation of BIOXTRA in relieving signs and symptoms of dry mouth after head and neck radiotherapy of cancer patients at Seyed-al--Shohada Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. Adv Biomed Res. 2012; 1: 72. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

Rode M. The role of saliva in the prevention of intraoral complications following irradiation. Zdrav Vestn 2000; 69: 423–8.

Kogoj – Rode M. Zobozdravniška osrba bolnikov, obsevanih v predelu glave in vratu. Zobozdrav Vestn 2003; 58: 86–92.

Cantor R, Curtis TA. Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. I. Anatomic, physiologic, and psychologic considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 25: 446–57.

Garrett N, Roumanas ED, Blackwell KE, Freymiller E, Abemayor E, Wong WK, Gerratt B, Berke G, Beumer J 3rd, Kapur KK. Efficacy of conventional and implant-supported mandibular resection prostheses: study overview and treatment outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96: 13–24.

Granström G. Placement of dental implants in irradiated bone: the case for using hyperbaric oxygen. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 812–8.

Ihde S, Kopp S, Gundlach K, Konstantinović VS. Effects of radiation therapy on craniofacial and dental implants: a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107: 56–65.

Granstrom G, Tjellstrom A, Branemark PI. Osseointegrated implants in irradiated bone: a case-controlled study using adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57: 493–9.

Visch LL, van Waas MA, Schmitz PI, Levendag PC. A clinical evaluation of implants in irradiated oral cancer patients. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 856–9.

Donoff RB. Treatment of the irradiated patient with dental implants: the case against hyperbaric oxygen treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 819–22.

How to Cite
1.
Zupančič R, Kuhar M. Oral rehabilitation with implant supported overdentures in patients with non-reconstructed segmental mandibulectomy: A report of two cases. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 1 [cited 22Sep.2019];82(10). Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/963
Section
Case report, short scientific article