The importance of magnetic resonance arthrography in the diagnosis of shoulder joint instability

Authors

  • Karmen Žiberna Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Vladka Salapura Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.3233

Keywords:

glenohumeral joint, shoulder instability, magnetic resonance arthrography, contrast agent

Abstract

The shoulder joint is the most mobile joint in the human body due to its structure, but for the same reason, it is also the most unstable joint. With complete or incomplete shoulder dislocations, the joint stabilizers are damaged. That makes the joint even more unstable, which leads to a vicious circle. Shoulder joint instability is often a problem for young people, especially athletes, so an accurate diagnosis of the trauma of small intra-articular structures is crucial for treating shoulder instability. The most established diagnostic method for shoulder instability is MR arthrography under the supervision of fluoroscopy. In recent years, with the rapid development of ultrasound technology, significant progress has been made, especially in the quality of high-frequency linear probes, which allows us to display small soft tissue structures accurately. The latter enabled the development of minimally invasive procedures, especially in the musculoskeletal organ system, in which precision and transparency are indispensable, and which include arthrography.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Beltran J, Rosenberg ZS, Chandnani VP, Cuomo F, Beltran S, Rokito A. Glenohumeral instability: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiographics. 1997;17(3):657-73.
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.17.3.9153704
PMID: 9153704

2. Kadi R, Milants A, Shahabpour M. Shoulder anatomy and normal variants. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2017;101(S2):3.
DOI: 10.5334/jbr-btr.1467
PMID: 30498801

3. Farber JM, Buckwalter KA. Sports-related injuries of the shoulder: instability. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40(2):235-49.
DOI: 10.1016/S0033-8389(02)00002-7
PMID: 12118823

4. Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW. History of arthrography. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47(3):373-86.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.12.001
PMID: 19361665

5. Terry GC, Chopp TM. Functional anatomy of the shoulder. J Athl Train. 2000;35(3):248-55.
PMID: 16558636

6. Sebro R, Oliveira A, Palmer WE. MR arthrography of the shoulder: technical update and clinical applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18(4):352-64.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1384825
PMID: 25184391

7. Dépelteau H, Bureau NJ, Cardinal E, Aubin B, Brassard P. Arthrography of the shoulder: a simple fluoroscopically guided approach for targeting the rotator cuff interval. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(2):329-32.
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.2.1820329
PMID: 14736656

8. Ogul H, Bayraktutan U, Ozgokce M, Tuncer K, Yuce I, Yalcin A, et al. Ultrasound-guided shoulder MR arthrography: comparison of rotator interval and posterior approach. Clin Imaging. 2014;38(1):11-7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.07.006
PMID: 24119385

9. Perdikakis E, Drakonaki E, Maris T, Karantanas A. MR arthrography of the shoulder: tolerance evaluation of four different injection techniques. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42(1):99-105.
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-012-1526-y
PMID: 23064511

10. Grasso RF, Faiella E, Cimini P, Cazzato RL, Luppi G, Martina F, et al. Direct magnetic resonance (MR) shoulder arthrography: posterior approach under ultrasonographic guidance and abduction (PAUGA). Radiol Med (Torino). 2013;118(5):806-15.
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-012-0879-6
PMID: 22986699

11. McCarthy CL. Glenohumeral instability. Imaging. 2014;23(1):20110084.
DOI: 10.1259/img.20110084

12. Ruiz Santiago F, Martínez Martínez A, Tomás Muñoz P, Pozo Sánchez J, Zarza Pérez A. Imaging of shoulder instability. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2017;7(4):422-33.
DOI: 10.21037/qims.2017.08.05
PMID: 28932699

13. Schneider R, Ghelman B, Kaye JJ. A simplified injection technique for shoulder arthrography. Radiology. 1975;114(3):738-9.
DOI: 10.1148/114.3.738b
PMID: 1118584

14. Farmer KD, Hughes PM. MR arthrography of the shoulder: fluoroscopically guided technique using a posterior approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(2):433-4.
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.2.1780433
PMID: 11804911

15. Rutten MJ, Collins JM, Maresch BJ, Smeets JH, Janssen CM, Kiemeney LA, et al. Glenohumeral joint injection: a comparative study of ultrasound and fluoroscopically guided techniques before MR arthrography. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(3):722-30.
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1200-x
PMID: 18958474

16. Salapura V, Mitrovič G, Čavka M. Ultrazvučni nadzor posteriornog pristupa kod MR artrografija ramena. Lijec Vjesn. 2017;139:268-72.

17. Ji JY. A Comparison between the Anterior and PosteriorApproach to US-guided Shoulder Articular Injections for MR Arthrography. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2008;59(4):269-73.
DOI: 10.3348/jkrs.2008.59.4.269

18. Messina C, Banfi G, Aliprandi A, Mauri G, Secchi F, Sardanelli F, et al. Ultrasound guidance to perform intra-articular injection of gadolinium-based contrast material for magnetic resonance arthrography as an alternative to fluoroscopy: the time is now. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(5):1221-5.
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3945-3
PMID: 26253260

19. Ng AW, Hung EH, Griffith JF, Tong CS, Cho CC. Comparison of ultrasound versus fluoroscopic guided rotator cuff interval approach for MR arthrography. Clin Imaging. 2013;37(3):548-53.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.08.002
PMID: 23601770

Published

2022-10-31

How to Cite

1.
The importance of magnetic resonance arthrography in the diagnosis of shoulder joint instability. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 2022 Oct. 31 [cited 2024 Sep. 28];91(9-10):393-7. Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/3233