Prevalence and causes of vaginal complaints in women in Slovenia: importance of comprehensive laboratory testing

Authors

  • Petra Vovko Department of Medical Microbiology, National Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, Novo mesto, Slovenia
  • Vesna Fabjan Vodušek Department of Perinatology, Division of Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Barbara Sodec Department of Medical Microbiology, National Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, Novo mesto, Slovenia
  • Matjaž Retelj Department for Microbiological Analysis of Food, Water and Other Environmental Samples, National Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, Novo mesto, Slovenia
  • Martina Bučar Community Health Centre Novo mesto, Novo mesto, Slovenia
  • Jasna Kostanjšek Community Health Centre Novo mesto, Novo mesto, Slovenia
  • Marijana Klarič Kamin Community Health Centre Novo mesto, Novo mesto, Slovenia
  • Veronika Testen Community Health Centre Novo mesto, Novo mesto, Slovenia
  • Nataša Tul Mandić Department of Perinatology, Division of Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.3450

Keywords:

vaginal discharge, bacterial vaginosis, aerobic vaginitis, candida, sexually transmitted infections

Abstract

Background: Women often experience abnormal vaginal discharge and other genital symptoms, which are due to disruptions in the vaginal microbiota (dysbiosis), vaginitis, and sexually transmitted infections. We wanted to determine the frequency of causes for these problems. We also examined the correlation between clinical diagnosis and laboratory test results.

Methods: A case-control study was conducted. Women who visited a primary care gynecologist for genital problems and corresponding control patients were included in the study. We performed clinical examinations and microbiological tests for bacterial vaginosis (BV), aerobic vaginitis (AV), candidal vulvovaginitis (CV), and sexually transmitted infections (STI).

Results: The study included 74 patients and 64 control subjects. The most common symptoms of patients were abnormal discharge, itching, unpleasant odour, and burning sensation. The most common cause was CV (39.2%), followed by BV (31.1%). One-fifth of the patients had at least one STI. AV was rare. Approximately 17% of patients had multiple concurrent causes of vaginal issues. Clinical diagnosis and laboratory findings matched in 26% of patients.

Conclusion: The results highlight the importance of comprehensive (syndromic) laboratory diagnosis in women with gynecological complaints. Narrowly focused laboratory diagnostics do not provide useful results due to the frequent concurrent presence of BV, AV, CV and STIs and the overlapping clinical signs of various causes of vaginal problems, which complicates the selection of appropriate treatment and leads to disease recurrence. In light of the results, more modern laboratory tests should be used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Novak M, Prosen B. Pogostnost bakterijske vaginoze in povezava s prezgodnjim porodom. Med Razgl. 1998;37:483-96.

2. van de Wijgert JH, Borgdorff H, Verhelst R, Crucitti T, Francis S, Verstraelen H, et al. The vaginal microbiota: what have we learned after a decade of molecular characterization? PLoS One. 2014;9(8).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105998
PMID: 25148517

3. France M, Alizadeh M, Brown S, Ma B, Ravel J. Towards a deeper understanding of the vaginal microbiota. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7(3):367-78.
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-022-01083-2
PMID: 35246662

4. Zhu B, Tao Z, Edupuganti L, Serrano MG, Buck GA. Roles of the Microbiota of the Female Reproductive Tract in Gynecological and Reproductive Health. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2022;86(4).
DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00181-21
PMID: 36222685

5. Marnach ML, Wygant JN, Casey PM. Evaluation and Management of Vaginitis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2022;97(2):347-58.
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.09.022
PMID: 35120697

6. Novak Ž, Fabjan-Vodušek V, Steblovnik L, Kavšek G, Hrašovec A, Štucin-Gantar I, et al. Zelo prezgodnji porod: presejalni testi za napovedovanje tveganja. Med Razgl. 2008;47:367-78.

7. Donders GG, Vereecken A, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Salembier G, Spitz B. Definition of a type of abnormal vaginal flora that is distinct from bacterial vaginosis: aerobic vaginitis. BJOG. 2002;109(1):34-43.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00432.x
PMID: 11845812

8. Fan A, Yue Y, Geng N, Zhang H, Wang Y, Xue F. Aerobic vaginitis and mixed infections: comparison of clinical and laboratory findings. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(2):329-35.
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2571-4
PMID: 23015152

9. Vieira-Baptista P, Tavares S, Lima-Silva J, Beires J, Donders G. Prevalence and epidemiology of aerobic vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis in Portuguese women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;206:e119-20.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.309

10. Wang C, Fan A, Li H, Yan Y, Qi W, Wang Y, et al. Vaginal bacterial profiles of aerobic vaginitis: a case-control study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;96(4).
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114981
PMID: 31955954

11. Sherrard J, Donders G, White D, Jensen JS; European IUSTI. European (IUSTI/WHO) guideline on the management of vaginal discharge, 2011. Int J STD AIDS. 2011;22(8):421-9.
DOI: 10.1258/ijsa.2011.011012
PMID: 21795415

12. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(2):297-301.
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991
PMID: 1706728

13. Marrazzo JM, Martin DH, Watts DH, Schulte J, Sobel JD, Hillier SL, et al. Bacterial vaginosis: identifying research gaps proceedings of a workshop sponsored by DHHS/NIH/NIAID. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(12):732-44.
DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181fbbc95
PMID: 21068695

14. Ison CA, Hay PE. Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78(6):413-5.
DOI: 10.1136/sti.78.6.413
PMID: 12473800

15. Rumyantseva T, Golparian D, Nilsson CS, Johansson E, Falk M, Fredlund H, et al. Evaluation of the new AmpliSens multiplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis. APMIS. 2015;123(10):879-86.
DOI: 10.1111/apm.12430
PMID: 26299582

16. Choe HS, Lee DS, Lee SJ, Hong SH, Park DC, Lee MK, et al. Performance of Anyplex™ II multiplex real-time PCR for the diagnosis of seven sexually transmitted infections: comparison with currently available methods. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17(12):e1134-40.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.07.011
PMID: 24095619

17. Berçot B, Amarsy R, Goubard A, Aparicio C, Loeung HU, Segouin C, et al. Assessment of co-infection of Sexually Transmitted pathogen microbes by performing the molecular kit AnyplexTM II STI-7. J Clin Microbiology. 2014;53(3):991-3.
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03370-14
PMID: 25540390

18. Kim Y, Kim J, Lee KA. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among healthy Korean women: implications of multiplex PCR pathogen detection on antibiotic therapy. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20(1):74-6.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2013.08.005
PMID: 24462432

19. Fernández G, Martró E, González V, Saludes V, Bascuñana E, Marcó C, et al. Usefulness of a novel multiplex real-time PCR assay for the diagnosis of sexually-transmitted infections. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2016;34(8):471-6.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2015.10.014
PMID: 26706392

20. Kusters JG, Reuland EA, Bouter S, Koenig P, Dorigo-Zetsma JW. A multiplex real-time PCR assay for routine diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(9):1779-85.
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-015-2412-z
PMID: 26143346

21. Centers for Disease Control and PreventionSexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015.

22. Donders GG, Bellen G, Grinceviciene S, Ruban K, Vieira-Baptista P. Aerobic vaginitis: no longer a stranger. Res Microbiol. 2017;168(9-10):845-58.
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.004
PMID: 28502874

23. Sobel JD, Akins RA. The Role of PCR in the Diagnosis of Candida Vulvovaginitis-a New Gold Standard? Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2015;17(6):488.
DOI: 10.1007/s11908-015-0488-3
PMID: 26003471

24. Lindner JG, Plantema FH, Hoogkamp-Korstanje JA. Quantitative studies of the vaginal flora of healthy women and of obstetric and gynaecological patients. J Med Microbiol. 1978;11(3):233-41.
DOI: 10.1099/00222615-11-3-233
PMID: 682174

25. Sobel JD. Pathogenesis and epidemiology of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;544(1):547-57.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb40450.x
PMID: 3063184

26. Schwiertz A, Taras D, Rusch K, Rusch V. Throwing the dice for the diagnosis of vaginal complaints? Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006;5(1):4.
DOI: 10.1186/1476-0711-5-4
PMID: 16503990

27. Anderson MR, Klink K, Cohrssen A. Evaluation of vaginal complaints. JAMA. 2004;291(11):1368-79.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.11.1368
PMID: 15026404

Published

2024-06-30

Issue

Section

Original article

How to Cite

1.
Prevalence and causes of vaginal complaints in women in Slovenia: importance of comprehensive laboratory testing. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Sep. 27];93(5-6):149-5. Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/3450