Primerjava kliničnega izida vstavitve totalne endoproteze kolka preko anteriornega in lateralnega pristopa: sistematični pregled z metaanalizo

Avtorji

  • Samo Roškar Ortopedska bolnišnica Valdoltra, Ankaran, Slovenija; Medicinska fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, Slovenija https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3314-0339
  • Rihard Trebše Ortopedska bolnišnica Valdoltra, Ankaran, Slovenija; Medicinska fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, Slovenija

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.3179

Ključne besede:

totalna endoproteza kolka, stranski pristop, neposredni sprednji pristop, klinični izid, metaanaliza

Povzetek

Izhodišča: Totalna endoproteza kolka velja za enega najuspešnejših posegov v ortopedski kirurgiji. Pomemben dejavnik vpliva na izid je izbira kirurškega pristopa. Trenutno je v svetu najbolj razširjen stranski pristop, v zadnjem času pa postaja zaradi manj poškodb mehkih tkiv vse bolj priljubljen sprednji pristop.

Metode: V sistemski pregled smo vključili randomizirane kontrolirane raziskave iz podatkovnih baz PubMed in Cochrane Library ter raziskave, prijavljene pri Clinical Trials. Iskanje smo opravili decembra 2019. Zabeležili smo podatek o državi, velikosti vzorca, posegu, izidu in času spremljanja. Metaanalizo smo opravili s programom Review Manager 5.3.

Rezultati: V metaanalizo smo vključili 7 randomiziranih kontroliranih raziskav s 723 preiskovanci. Med sprednjim in stranskim pristopom totalne endoproteze kolka ni razlik v funkcionalnem stanju, vrednotenem po Harrisu ob koncu spremljanja, v oceni bolečine po vizualni analogni lestvici tako v zgodnjem kot poznem obdobju po operaciji, v izgubi krvi, v potrebi po transfuziji, v trajanju bolnišnične oskrbe in v pojavnosti zapletov med operacijo in po njej.

Zaključki: Primerjava sprednjega in stranskega pristopa kaže, da med pristopoma ni statistično pomembnih razlik v funkcionalnem stanju ob koncu spremljanja, v oceni bolečine tako v zgodnjem kot poznem obdobju po operaciji, v izgubi krvi, v potrebi po transfuziji, v trajanju bolnišnične oskrbe in v pojavnosti zapletov med operacijo in po njej. Trenutno ne poteka nobena randomizirana kontrolirana raziskava, ki bi primerjala izid sprednjega in stranskega pristopa z natančno zastavljenim protokolom spremljanja.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

1. Marques EM, Humphriss R, Welton NJ, Higgins JP, Hollingworth W, Lopez-Lopez JA, et al. The choice between hip prosthetic bearing surfaces in total hip replacement: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):19.
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0189-5
PMID: 26831503

2. Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: indications, technique, and results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(9):595-603.
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-595
PMID: 25157041

3. Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R, Salai M, Amar E. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(11):1595-600.
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1828-0
PMID: 23912418

4. Galakatos GR. Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. Mo Med. 2018;114(6):537-41.
PMID: 30643349

5. Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Seng BE, Adams JB. Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:107-20.
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00525
PMID: 19884418

6. Brismar BH, Hallert O, Tedhamre A, Lindgren JU. Early gain in pain reduction and hip function, but more complications following the direct anterior minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial of 100 patients with 5 years of follow up. Acta Orthop. 2018;89(5):484-9.
DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1504505
PMID: 30350758

7. Mayr E, Nogler M, Benedetti MG, Kessler O, Reinthaler A, Krismer M, et al. A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: a gait analysis study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24(10):812-8.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.07.010
PMID: 19699566

8. Mjaaland KE, Kivle K, Svenningsen S, Pripp AH, Nordsletten L. Comparison of markers for muscle damage, inflammation, and pain using minimally invasive direct anterior versus direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Orthop Res. 2015;33(9):1305-10.
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22911
PMID: 25877694

9. Parvizi J, Restrepo C, Maltenfort MG. Total hip arthroplasty performed through direct anterior approach provides superior early outcome: results of a randomized, prospective study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016;47(3):497-504.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2016.03.003
PMID: 27241374

10. Reichert JC, von Rottkay E, Roth F, Renz T, Hausmann J, Kranz J, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of the minimally invasive direct anterior and the transgluteal approach for primary total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):241.
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2133-4
PMID: 30025519

11. Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(5):671-9.e1.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.002
PMID: 20378307

12. Zomar BO, Bryant D, Hunter S, Howard JL, Vasarhelyi EM, Lanting BA. A randomised trial comparing spatio-temporal gait parameters after total hip arthroplasty between the direct anterior and direct lateral surgical approaches. Hip Int. 2018;28(5):478-84.
DOI: 10.1177/1120700018760262
PMID: 29781289

13. Wang Z, Bao HW, Hou JZ. Direct anterior versus lateral approaches for clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):63.
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1095-z
PMID: 30808382

14. Yue C, Kang P, Pei F. Comparison of direct anterior and lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(50):e2126.
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002126
PMID: 26683920

15. Putananon C, Tuchinda H, Arirachakaran A, Wongsak S, Narinsorasak T, Kongtharvonskul J. Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: network meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(2):255-67.
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2046-1
PMID: 28956180

16. Kucukdurmaz F, Sukeik M, Parvizi J. A meta-analysis comparing the direct anterior with other approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Surgeon. 2019;17(5):291-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2018.09.001
PMID: 30361126

17. NIH US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Comparison between anterior and direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty (NCT01578746). Bethesda: NIH US NLM; 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01578746.

18. NIH US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty (NCT00881998). Bethesda: NIH US NLM; 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00881998.

19. NIH US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Direct anterior approach versus direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty (DAAvsDLA) (NCT02719236). Bethesda: NIH US NLM; 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02719236.

20. NIH US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcomes following anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty (AAP) (NCT01353885). Bethesda: NIH US NLM; 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01353885.

Objavljeno

2022-06-30

Številka

Rubrika

Sistematični pregledni članek

Kako citirati

1.
Primerjava kliničnega izida vstavitve totalne endoproteze kolka preko anteriornega in lateralnega pristopa: sistematični pregled z metaanalizo. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 2022 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Sep. 27];91(5-6):226-3. Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/3179

Najbolj brani prispevki istega avtorja(jev)