Regional anaesthetic techniques in 14 Slovenian obstetric units between 2013 and 2021: where are we and where are we going?

Authors

  • Tatjana Stopar Pintarič Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Ivan Verdenik Deparment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Unit, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6249-5799

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.3518

Keywords:

caesarean section, regional anaesthesia, remifentanil, meperidine

Abstract

Background: The use of regional anaesthetic techniques for caesarean section and labour analgesia is necessary for quality-driven obstetric anaesthesia as required by European minimum standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments, which were issued by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy in 2020. The aim of this article is to evaluate the rate of caesarean sections performed using regional anaesthetic techniques and the rates of epidural, remifentanil-PCA, and meperidine analgesia for managing labour pain across the 14 Slovenian obstetric units, respectively.

Methods: Data from the Slovenian National Perinatal Information System (NPIS) from 2013 to 2021 were analysed.

Results: Spinal anaesthesia was used as a primary anaesthetic method (> 50% of elective caesarean sections) in a half of Slovenian obstetric units. For emergency caesarean sections, regional anaesthetic methods (spinal and epidural) were used in > 50% parturients in 3 obstetric units. Eight obstetric units had an epidural rate of >10%. The use of epidural analgesia has progressively increased in 9 of 14 obstetric units. Remifentanil has been routinely used in 6 obstetric units. Accordingly, the consumption of meperidine has dropped in all but one obstetric unit in Slovenia.

Conclusion: In the past decade, considerable progress has been observed in obstetric anaesthesia practice in Slovenia. This is evident from the increased use of regional anaesthesia for caesarean section and labour analgesia. However, there are considerable discrepancies in anaesthetic practices between different obstetric units in Slovenia, a situation the parturients should be informed of well in advance to be able to choose the obstetric unit according to their labour and delivery preferences. In order to avoid the differences in the quality and accessibility of anaesthetic practice between units, it is necessary to increase the number of anaesthesiologists involved in obstetric anaesthesia to ensure 24/7 service of labour analgesia to be able to fulfill minimum European standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Khor LJ, Jeskins G, Cooper GM, Paterson-Brown S. National obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK 1997/1998. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(12):1168-72.
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01720.x
PMID: 11121925

2. Hirshberg A, Srinivas SK. Epidemiology of maternal morbidity and mortality. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(6):332-7.
DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.007
PMID: 28823579

3. Guglielminotti J, Landau R, Li G. Adverse Events and Factors Associated with Potentially Avoidable Use of General Anesthesia in Cesarean Deliveries. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(6):912-22.
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002629
PMID: 30789362

4. Kearns RJ, Shaw M, Gromski PS, Iliodromiti S, Pell JP, Lawlor DA, et al. Neonatal and early childhood outcomes following maternal anesthesia for cesarean section: a population-based cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(6):482-9.
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102441
PMID: 33832987

5. Watson SE, Richardson AL, Lucas DN. Neuraxial and general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2022;36(1):53-68.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.04.007
PMID: 35659960

6. Lucas DN, Gough KL. Enhanced recovery in obstetrics—a new frontier? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013;22(2):92-5.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.02.001
PMID: 23477889

7. Shnider SM, Abboud TK, Artal R, Henriksen EH, Stefani SJ, Levinson G. Maternal catecholamines decrease during labor after lumbar epidural anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147(1):13-5.
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90076-5
PMID: 6614080

8. Lederman RP, Lederman E, Work B, McCann DS. Anxiety and epinephrine in multiparous women in labor: relationship to duration of labor and fetal heart rate pattern. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;153(8):870-7.
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90692-1
PMID: 4073158

9. Soet JE, Brack GA, DiIorio C. Prevalence and predictors of women’s experience of psychological trauma during childbirth. Birth. 2003;30(1):36-46.
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00215.x
PMID: 12581038

10. Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2016;124(2):270-300.
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935
PMID: 26580836

11. Nanji JA, Carvalho B. Pain management during labor and vaginal birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;67:100-12.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.002
PMID: 32265134

12. Blajic I, Zagar T, Semrl N, Umek N, Lucovnik M, Stopar Pintaric T. Analgesic efficacy of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus combined spinal-epidural technique in multiparous women during labour. Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(11):797-803.
DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0053
PMID: 33914329

13. Guasch E, Brogly N, Mercier FJ, Ioscovich A, Weiniger CF, Lucas N, et al. European minimum standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments: an experts’ consensus. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;37(12):1115-25.
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001362
PMID: 33074944

14. Stopar Pintarič T, Graovac D, Blajić I. Zagotavljanje 24/7 epiduralne analgezije v Porodnišnici Ljubljana od leta 2013-2023. Interno: itnerni časopis Univerzitetnega kliničnega centra Ljubljana. 2023(02):12-3.

15. Stopar Pintaric T. Področja anestezija/analgezija po slovenskih porodnišnicah: kje smo in kam gremo? 1. jesenski simpozij porodniške anestezije z mednarodno udeležbo. Ljubljana. November 2023; Maribor: UKC Maribor, Oddelek za anestezijologijo, intenzivno terapijo in terapijo bolečin; 2023-17. [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from: www.ukc-mb.si/media/files/uploads/zborniki/Prvi_jesenski_simpozij_porodniske_anestezije_zbornik.pdf.

16. Chien P. Global rising rates of caesarean sections. BJOG. 2021;128(5):781-2.
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16666
PMID: 33667015

17. Novak-Antolič Ž, Verdenik I. Primerjava slovenskih perinatalnih podatkov z evropskimi ali čim bolj nazaj gledamo, dlje v prihodnost bomo videli. Zdrav Vestn. 2009;78(1):II-9-23.

18. Stopar Pintaric T. Recent adances in obstetric anesthesia pracitce for Caesarean secion (CS) at the hospital for gynecology and obstetric in Postojna, Slovenia. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. 2003;28(5 Suppl 1):47.

19. Desai N, Carvalho B. Conversion of labour epidural analgesia to surgical anaesthesia for emergency intrapartum Caesarean section. BJA Educ. 2020;20(1):26-31.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.09.006
PMID: 33456912

20. Rezaei Ghamsari S, Taeidi E, Darsareh F, Mehrnoush V. Analysis of Cesarean Section Rates in a Public Tertiary Hospital During Teaching and Non-teaching Periods Using the Robson Ten Group Classification System. Cureus. 2023;15(8).
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43838
PMID: 37736452

21. Bergant J, Sirc T, Lucovnik M, Verdenik I, Stopar Pintaric T. Obporodna analgezija in izidi porodov v Sloveniji : retrospektivna analiza porodov v obdobju 2003-2013. Zdrav Vestn. 2016;85(2):83-91.

22. Stopar Pintaric T. Porod brez bolečin. Otrok in družina : revija za družinsko in družbeno vzgojo. 2003(1):6-9.

23. Stopar Pintaric T. Porod brez muk je veličastno doživetje. Dnevnik. 2002;52(302):29.

24. Reš-Muravec U, Plesko-Mlakar A, Stopar-Pintaric T, Grmek S, Likar R, Jordan T, et al. Naše izkušnje z epiduralno porodno analgezijo. Zbornik referatov. Slovenski kongres porodničarjev in ginekologov. Rogla. 11.-13. september 2003; Ljubljana: Slovensko zdravniško društvo; 2003-194. [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-D8XHCJHQ.

25. Melber AA, Jelting Y, Huber M, Keller D, Dullenkopf A, Girard T, et al. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour: six-year audit of outcome data of the RemiPCA SAFE Network (2010-2015). Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;39:12-21.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.12.004
PMID: 30685299

26. Murray H, Hodgkinson P, Hughes D. Remifentanil patient-controlled intravenous analgesia during labour: a retrospective observational study of 10 years’ experience. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;39:29-34.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.012
PMID: 31230993

27. Robson MS. The 10-Group Classification System-a new way of thinking. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):1-4.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.026
PMID: 29941276

28. Markova L, Lucovnik M, Verdenik I, Stopar Pintarič T. Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;277:53-6.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.011
PMID: 35998385

29. Lucovnik M, Verdenik I, Stopar Pintaric T. Intrapartum Cesarean Section and Perinatal Outcomes after Epidural Analgesia or Remifentanil-PCA in Breech and Twin Deliveries. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(6):1026.
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59061026
PMID: 37374230

30. Wilson MJ, MacArthur C, Hewitt CA, Handley K, Gao F, Beeson L, et al.; RESPITE Trial Collaborative Group. Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour (RESPITE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10148):662-72.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31613-1
PMID: 30115484

31. Douma MR, Verwey RA, Kam-Endtz CE, van der Linden PD, Stienstra R. Obstetric analgesia: a comparison of patient-controlled meperidine, remifentanil, and fentanyl in labour. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(2):209-15.
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aep359
PMID: 20008859

32. Reynolds F. Labour analgesia and the baby: good news is no news. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20(1):38-50.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.08.004
PMID: 21146977

Published

2024-09-29

Issue

Section

Review

How to Cite

1.
Regional anaesthetic techniques in 14 Slovenian obstetric units between 2013 and 2021: where are we and where are we going?. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 29 [cited 2024 Oct. 18];:1-10. Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/3518

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>