INTERVERTEBRAL SIZE MEASUREMENT WITH ANTHROPOMETRIC METHOD

Authors

  • Zmago Turk Oddelek za fizikalno in rehabilitacijsko medicino Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2000 Maribor
  • Dušan Čelan Oddelek za fizikalno in rehabilitacijsko medicino Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2000 Maribor
  • Breda Jesenšek Papež Oddelek za fizikalno in rehabilitacijsko medicino Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2000 Maribor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.2306

Keywords:

intervertebral disk, anthropometry, back pain, reference values, tomography, X-ray computed

Abstract

Background. There is a positive correlation between the size of intervertebral disc (IVD) and the incidence of Low Back Pain (LBP). Columbini evaluated the size of IVD anthropometricaly but how this measurement correlates with radiologic measurements of IVD square size is steel unknown.

Objective. The aim of the study was to search for non-invasive method and cheap and fast evaluation of IVD size with the modification of Columbini’s antropometric formula.

Materials and methods. The measurements (anthropometrics, X-ray, CT with range of interest measurement [ROI]) were done on 40 bus-drivers. The realibility test was done on 65 bus-drivers.

Results. CT measurement of the size of the intervertebral disc was done using ROI (Range of Interest). Using the statistical analysis based on linear regression, correlation, curve fitting and realibility the author made the modification of Columbini’s formula. The incidence of Low Back Pain was statistically significantly higher in people with smaller IVD, particularly in men.

Conclusions. With the Columbini’s method of anthropometric measurement of the size of IVD modified by Turk it is possible to make the right measurement prognosis in 89% of cases. Consequently, there is no need to use invasive and costly diagnostic radiologic methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Stanley S, Tanz MD. Motion of the lumbar spine. Amer J Roentgenology 1953; 69: 399–412.

Stojanović J. Vrijednost spinalne angiografije u dijagnostici patološkog procesa kralješnice i kralješnične moždine. Doktorska disertacija. Zagreb: Medicinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 1983.

Cooper BRG, Forbes WC, Jayson MIV. Radiographic demonstration of paraspinal muscle wasting in patients with chronic low back pain. Br J Rheumatol 1992; 31: 389–94.

Nachemson A. Lumbar discography-where we are today? Spine 1990; 15: 839–40.

Tournade A, Patay Z, Krupa P, Tajahmady T, Million S, Braun M. A comparative study of the anatomical, radiological and therapeutic features of the lumbar facet joints. Neuroradiology 1992; 34: 257–61.

Pedotti A. Computerized analysis of stress in spine by image processing of body movement. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy 1990; 5: 245–51.

Colombini D, Occhipinti E, Grieco A, Faccini M. Estimation of lumbar disc areas by means of anthropometric parameters. Spine 1989; 14: 51–5.

Battie MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE, Fisher LD, Manninen H, Gill K. Determinants of lumbar disc degeneration. A study relating lifetime exposures and magnetic resonance imaging findings in identical twins. Spine 1995; 20: 2601–12.

Schultz AB, Andersson GBJ. Analysis of loads on the lumbar spine. Spine 1981; 1: 76–82.

Gilad I, Nissan M. The cervical and lumbar vertebra: an anthropometrics model. Engin Med 1984; 13: 111–5.

Scoles PV, Linton AE, Latimer B, Levy ME, Digiovani BF. Vertebral body and posterior element morphology: the normal spine in middle life. Spine 1988; 13: 1082–6.

Natarajan RN, Andersson GBJ. A model to study the disc degeneration process. Spine 1994; 19: 259–65.

Eriksson K, Nemeth G, Eriksson E. Low back pain in elite cross-country skiers. A retrospective epidemiological study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1996; 6: 31–5.

Matiecgka J. The testing of physical efficiency. Amer J Physl Antropol 1921; 9: 223–30.

Boos N, Wallin A, Gbedegbergonom T, Aebi M, Boesch C. Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disks and vertebral bodies: influence of diural water content variations. Radiology 1992; 188: 351–4.

Boos N, Wallin A, Schmucker T, Aebi M, Boesch C. Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disks and vertebral bodies: methodology, reproductibility and preliminary results. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 12: 557–87.

Boos N, Boesch C. Quantitative MR imaging of the lumbar spine. Potential for investigations of water content and biochemical composition. Spine 1995; 21: 2365–8.

Marotti M, Kovačević D. Dijagnostičke mogućnosti magnetske rezonancije. Liječ Vjesn 1991; 113: 186–8.

Turk Z. Utjecaj veličine intervertebralnoga diska na nastanak lumbalnog sindroma. Doktorska disertacija. Zagreb: Medicinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 1998.

Issue

Section

Professional Article

How to Cite

1.
INTERVERTEBRAL SIZE MEASUREMENT WITH ANTHROPOMETRIC METHOD. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 2004 Apr. 25 [cited 2024 Nov. 2];73(4). Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2306