Merske lastnosti številske lestvice za oceno intenzivnosti bolečine pri pacientih z mišično-skeletnimi okvarami na udih – sistematični pregled literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.3108Ključne besede:
številska lestvica, intenzivnost bolečine, veljavnost, zanesljivost, mišično-skeletni sistemPovzetek
Izhodišča: Za oceno intenzivnosti bolečine je pogosto v uporabi številska lestvica z ocenami od 0 do 10. Ocenjevanje je lahko ustno ali pisno. Namen pregleda literature je bil povzeti njene merske lastnosti pri pacientih z mišično-skeletnimi okvarami na udih.
Metode: Sistematično so bile pregledane podatkovne zbirke PubMed, CINAHL in Cochrane library.
Rezultati: V pregled je bilo vključenih 13 raziskav. Pri pacientih z mišično-skeletnimi okvarami na udih ima številska lestvica zelo dobro do odlično zanesljivost ponovnega ocenjevanja. Povezanost z vidno analogno lestvico in z lestvico za besedno ocenjevanje bolečine je zelo dobra do odlična, kar potrjuje veljavnost konstrukta. Najmanjša pomembna sprememba je dve oceni.
Zaključek: Številska lestvica je zanesljiva in veljavna za oceno bolečine, ki je posledica mišično-skeletnih okvar na udih. Ne moremo potrditi boljših merskih lastnosti ocenjevanja na ustni ali pisni način. Ocenjevanje mora slediti natančnim navodilom, posredovanim pacientu.
Prenosi
Literatura
1. Bolezni kostno-mišičnega sistema. Ljubljana: Nacionalni inštitut za javno zdravje; 2018 [cited 2019 May 30]. Available from: https://www.nijz.si/sl/bolezni-kostno-misicnega-sistema.
2. Musculoskeletal conditions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2019 May 30]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions.
3. Barr KP. Review of upper and lower extremity musculoskeletal pain problems. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2007;18(4):747-60.
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2007.07.009
PMID: 17967363
4. Banerjee M, Bouillon B, Shafizadeh S, Paffrath T, Lefering R, Wafaisade A; German Trauma Registry Group. Epidemiology of extremity injuries in multiple trauma patients. Injury. 2013;44(8):1015-21.
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.007
PMID: 23287554
5. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey 2017 Data Release. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); 2017 [cited 2019 May 30]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/nhis_2017_data_release.htm.
6. Mednarodna klasifikacija funkcioniranja, zmanjšane zmožnosti in zdravja. Geneva: World Health Organization; Ljubljana: Inštitut za varovanje zdravja Republike Slovenije; Inštitut Republike Slovenije za rehabilitacijo; 2006.
7. Allet L, Bürge E, Monnin D. ICF: clinical relevance for physiotherapy? A critical review. Adv Physiother. 2008;10(3):127-37.
DOI: 10.1080/14038190802315941
8. Scherer M, Schaefer H, Blozik E, Chenot JF, Himmel W. The experience and management of neck pain in general practice: the patients’ perspective. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(6):963-71.
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1297-x
PMID: 20151163
9. Champion GD, Goodenough B, von Baeyer CL, Thomas W. Measurement of pain by selfreport. In: Finley GA, McGrath PJ. Measurement of pain in infants and children: Progress in pain research and management. ;Vol. 10. Seattle: IASP Press; 1998.
10. Jensen MP, Karoly P. Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. In: Turk DC, Melzack R. Handbook of pain assessment. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. pp. 21-44.
11. Jakovljević M, Puh U. Ocenjevanje intenzivnosti bolečine z vidno analogno lestvico. Fizioterapija. 2014;22(2):46-55.
12. Halfaker DA, Akeson ST, Hathcock DR, Mattson C, Wunderlich TL. Psychological aspests of pain. In: Lennard TA, Walkowski SA, Singla AK, Vivian D. Pain procedures in clinical practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011. pp. 13-22.
DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-4160-3779-8.10003-X
13. Herr KA, Spratt K, Mobily PR, Richardson G. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(4):207-19.
DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200407000-00002
PMID: 15218405
14. Birnie KA, Hundert AS, Lalloo C, Nguyen C, Stinson JN. Recommendations for selection of self-report pain intensity measures in children and adolescents: a systematic review and quality assessment of measurement properties. Pain. 2019;160(1):5-18.
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001377
PMID: 30180088
15. Castarlenas E, Jensen MP, von Baeyer CL, Miró J. Psychometric properties of the numerical rating scale to assess self-reported pain intensity in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(4):376-83.
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000406
PMID: 27518484
16. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al.; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(6):1073-93.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016
PMID: 21621130
17. Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(4):707-14.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008
PMID: 29321111
18. Safikhani S, Gries KS, Trudeau JJ, Reasner D, Rüdell K, Coons SJ, et al. Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018;2(2):40.
DOI: 10.1186/s41687-018-0053-6
PMID: 30238085
19. Kim YS, Park JM, Moon YS, Han SH. Assessment of pain in the elderly: A literature review. Natl Med J India. 2017;30(4):203-7.
DOI: 10.4103/0970-258X.218673
PMID: 29162753
20. Chiarotto A, Maxwell LJ, Ostelo RW, Boers M, Tugwell P, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of visual analogue scale, numeric rating scale, and pain severity subscale of the brief pain inventory in patients with low back pain: A systematic review. J Pain. 2019;20(3):245-63.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.07.009
PMID: 30099210
21. Lemeunier N, da Silva-Oolup S, Olesen K, Shearer H, Carroll LJ, Brady O, et al. Reliability and validity of self-reported questionnaires to measure pain and disability in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: part 3-a systematic review from the CADRE Collaboration. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(5):1156-79.
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-05949-8
PMID: 30879185
22. Goldsmith ES, Taylor BC, Greer N, Murdoch M, MacDonald R, McKenzie L, et al. Focused evidence review: psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for chronic musculoskeletal pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(S1):61-70.
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4327-8
PMID: 29633142
23. Englbrecht M, Tarner IH, van der Heijde DM, Manger B, Bombardier C, Müller-Ladner U. Measuring pain and efficacy of pain treatment in inflammatory arthritis: a systematic literature review. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2012;90(0):3-10.
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.120335
PMID: 22942322
24. Caraceni A. Evaluation and assessment of cancer pain and cancer pain treatment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(9):1067-75.
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450903.x
PMID: 11683654
25. Bourdel N, Alves J, Pickering G, Ramilo I, Roman H, Canis M. Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: how to choose a scale? Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(1):136-52.
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu046
PMID: 25180023
26. Jennings PA, Cameron P, Bernard S. Measuring acute pain in the prehospital setting. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(8):552-5.
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2008.062539
PMID: 19625547
27. Coll AM, Ameen JR, Moseley LG. Reported pain after day surgery: a critical literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(1):53-65.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02965.x
PMID: 15030442
28. Caraceni A, Cherny N, Fainsinger R, Kaasa S, Poulain P, Radbruch L, et al. Pain measurement tools and methods in clinical research in palliative care: recommendations of an Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;23(3):239-55.
DOI: 10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00409-2
PMID: 11888722
29. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 2015.
30. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
PMID: 17161752
31. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
PMID: 19622551
32. Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal A, Iqbal ZA. Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain. J Pain Res. 2018;11(11):851-6.
DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S158847
PMID: 29731662
33. Riley SP, Tafuto V, Cote M, Brismee JM, Wright A, Cook C. Reliability and relationship of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire with the shoulder pain and disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;20:1-7.
PMID: 29558227
34. Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal ZA. The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(24):2392-7.
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1129441
PMID: 26733318
35. da Cunha RA, Hazime FA, da Silva Martins MC, Ferreira M, de Castro Pochini A, Ejnisman B. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and clinimetric testing of instruments used to assess patients with ankle sprain in the brazilian population. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(12):1042-50.
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6218
PMID: 27825293
36. Sendlbeck M, Araujo EG, Schett G, Englbrecht M. Psychometric properties of three single-item pain scales in patients with rheumatoid arthritis seen during routine clinical care: a comparative perspective on construct validity, reproducibility and internal responsiveness. RMD Open. 2015;1(1):e000140.
DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000140
PMID: 26719815
37. da Cunha RA, Costa LO, Hespanhol Junior LC, Pires RS, Kujala UM, Lopes AD. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and clinimetric testing of instruments used to assess patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in the Brazilian population. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(5):332-9.
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4228
PMID: 23485881
38. Puga VO, Lopes AD, Shiwa SR, Alouche SR, Costa LO. Clinimetric testing supports the use of 5 questionnaires adapted into Brazilian Portuguese for patients with shoulder disorders. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(6):404-13.
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4441
PMID: 23508329
39. Hefford C, Abbott JH, Arnold R, Baxter GD. The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(2):56-65.
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3953
PMID: 22333510
40. Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (quickDASH) and numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(6):920-6.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015
PMID: 19297202
41. Herr K, Spratt KF, Garand L, Li L. Evaluation of the Iowa pain thermometer and other selected pain intensity scales in younger and older adult cohorts using controlled clinical pain: a preliminary study. Pain Med. 2007;8(7):585-600.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00316.x
PMID: 17883743
42. Bergh I, Sjöström B, Odén A, Steen B. Assessing pain and pain relief in geriatric patients with non-pathological fractures with different rating scales. Aging (Milano). 2001;13(5):355-61.
DOI: 10.1007/BF03351503
PMID: 11820708
43. Herr KA, Mobily PR. Comparison of selected pain assessment tools for use with the elderly. Appl Nurs Res. 1993;6(1):39-46.
DOI: 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80041-2
PMID: 8439177
44. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978;37(4):378-81.
DOI: 10.1136/ard.37.4.378
PMID: 686873
45. Pasero C, McCaffery M. Assessment. In: Pasero C. McCaffery M. Pain assessment and pharmacologic management. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2011. pp. 13-176.
46. Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, Tuckey L. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a digital version of the visual analog scale. J Hand Ther. 2011;24(4):356-63.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.06.003
PMID: 21820864
47. Helfand M, Freeman M. Assessment and management of acute pain in adult medical inpatients: a systematic review. Pain Med. 2009;10(7):1183-99.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00718.x
PMID: 19818030
48. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, et al.; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113(1-2):9-19.
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012
PMID: 15621359
49. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94(2):149-58.
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9
PMID: 11690728
50. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004;8(4):283-91.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004
PMID: 15207508
51. Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2005;30(11):1331-4.
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29
PMID: 15928561
52. Michener LA, Snyder AR, Leggin BG. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain and the effect of surgical status. J Sport Rehabil. 2011;20(1):115-28.
DOI: 10.1123/jsr.20.1.115
PMID: 21411827
53. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14(7):798-804.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x
PMID: 16000093
54. Pereira LV, Pereira GA, Moura LA, Fernandes RR. Pain intensity among institutionalized elderly: a comparison between numerical scales and verbal descriptors. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49(5):804-10.
DOI: 10.1590/S0080-623420150000500014
PMID: 26516751
55. Ware LJ, Epps CD, Herr K, Packard A. Evaluation of the revised faces pain scale, verbal descriptor scale, numeric rating scale, and Iowa pain thermometer in older minority adults. Pain Manag Nurs. 2006;7(3):117-25.
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2006.06.005
PMID: 16931417
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrika
Licenca
Avtor na prispevku, ki ga bo pripravil za Zdravniški vestnik, po pogodbi nanj prenaša vse materialne avtorske pravice, kakor izhajajo iz 22. člena Zakona o avtorski in sorodnih pravicah, in sicer pravico reproduciranja, pravico javnega izvajanja, pravico javnega prenašanja, pravico javnega predvajanja s fonogrami in videogrami, pravico javnega prikazovanja, pravico radiodifuznega oddajanja, pravico radiodifuzne retransmisije, pravico sekundarnega radiodifuznega oddajanja, pravico dajanja na voljo javnosti, pravico predelave, pravico avdiovizualne priredbe, pravico distribuiranja ter pravico dajanja v najem in vse druge pravice avtorja v skladu z ZASP.
Avtorjev prenos pravic po pogodbi je neizključen, velja za neomejeno število izdaj, za ves čas trajanja materialnih avtorskih pravic ter je prostorsko neomejen.
Avtor sme avtorsko delo tudi sam izkoriščati ali avtorske pravice prenašati na tretje osebe, vendar oboje šele po preteku 3 mesecev od prve objave dela v reviji Zdravniški vestnik.
Avtor Zdravniškemu vestniku izrecno dovoli, da lahko pravice, pridobljene v skladu s pogodbo prenaša naprej na tretje osebe brez omejitev.
Avtor se strinja, da Zdravniški vestnik prispevek objavi pod pogoji licence Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (navedba avtorstva-nekomercialno) ali primerljive licence.
