THE ROLE OF LYMPHADENECTOMY IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER

Authors

  • Iztok Takač Oddelek za ginekološko onkologijo in onkologijo dojk Klinični oddelek za ginekologijo in perinatologijo Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2101 Maribor
  • Darja Arko Oddelek za ginekološko onkologijo in onkologijo dojk Klinični oddelek za ginekologijo in perinatologijo Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2101 Maribor
  • Robert Bali Oddelek za ginekološko onkologijo in onkologijo dojk Klinični oddelek za ginekologijo in perinatologijo Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2101 Maribor
  • Nina Čas Sikošek Oddelek za ginekološko onkologijo in onkologijo dojk Klinični oddelek za ginekologijo in perinatologijo Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2101 Maribor
  • Borut Gorišek Oddelek za ginekološko onkologijo in onkologijo dojk Klinični oddelek za ginekologijo in perinatologijo Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2101 Maribor
  • Dunja Zukanović Oddelek za ginekološko onkologijo in onkologijo dojk Klinični oddelek za ginekologijo in perinatologijo Splošna bolnišnica Maribor Ljubljanska 5 2101 Maribor

Keywords:

endometrial carcinoma, lymphadenectomy, staging

Abstract

Background. Lymphatics are the main pathway for distant spread of endometrial cancer. The node groups most commonly involved are located along the iliac and retroperitoneal vessels. Therefore, pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy are performed for staging and therapeutic purposes.

Methods. Lymphadenectomy is indicated in patients having moderate to high risk for lymph node metastasis (grade 2 and 3 tumor, myoinvasion > 50%, clear cell, squamous and serous papillary tumors). In patients with low risk for node metastasis (myometrial invasion absent or < 50% with grades 1 lymphadenectomy is questionable. Patterns of lymphatic spread indicate that lymphadenectomy should include superficial obturator, external iliac, and common iliac nodes. Internal iliac, deep obturator, deep common iliac, presacral and aortic nodes should be removed only from patients having node metastases at frozen section.

Conclusions. A thorough staging lymphadenectomy provides more accurate information to select patients who are candidates for adjuvant treatment. The main role of this procedure is in individualized tailoring of adequate adjuvant treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pompe-Kirn V, Golouh R, Lindtner J, Primic-Žakelj M, Ravnihar B, Rudolf Z, Serša G, Zakotnik B eds. Incidenca raka v Sloveniji 1999. In: Register raka za Slovenijo, poročilo št. 41. Ljubljana: Onkološki inštitut 2002, 41: 44–4.

Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Cutillo G et al. Anatomical and pathological study of retroperitoneal nodes in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998; 8: 322–7.

Burrel MO, Franklin EW, Powell JL. Endometrial cancer: Evaluation of spread and follow-up in 189 patients with stage I or stage II disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 181–5

Boronow RC, Morrow CP, Creasman WT et al. Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: Clinicopathological findings of a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 65: 825–32.

Chen SS. Extrauterine spread in endometrial carcinoma clinically confined to the uterus. Gynecol Oncol 1985; 21: 23–31.

Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer 1987; 60: 2035–41.

Mariani A, Webb MJ, Rao SK, Lesnick TG, Podratz KC. Significance of pathologic patterns of pelvic lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80: 113–20.

Announcements: FIGO stages: 1988 revision. Gynecol Oncol 1989; 35: 125–6.

McMeekin DS, Lashbrook D, Gold M, Johnson G, Walker JL, Mannel R. Analysis of FIGO stage IIIc endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 81: 273–8.

Boronow RC. Surgical staging of endometrial cancer: Evolution, evaluation, and responsible challenge – a personal perspective. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 66: 179–89.

Mariani A, Webb MJ, Keeney GL, Podratz KC. Routes of lymhatic spread: A study of 112 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 81: 100–4.

Girardi F, Petru E, Heydarfadai M, Haas J, Winter R. Pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1993; 49: 177–80.

Feuer GA, Calanog A. Endometrial carcinoma: Treatment of positive paraaortic nodes. Gynecol Oncol 1987; 27: 104–9.

Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Kurman RJ, Creasman WT, Heller P, Homesley HD et al. Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium. A gynecology group study. Gynecol Oncol 1991; 40: 55–65.

Benedet JL, Pecorelli S eds. Staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines of gynecologic cancers by the FIGO Comittee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2000; 70: 207–312.

Arko D, Takač I. High frequency transvaginal ultrasonography in preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 639–43.

Cheng WF, Chen CA, Lee CN, Chen TM, Huang KT, Hsieh CY, Hsieh FJ. Preoperative ultrasound study in predicting lymph node metastasis for endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 71: 424–7.

Sood AK, Buller RE, Burger RA, Dawson JD, Sorosky JI, Berman M. Value of preoperative CA 125 level in the management of uterine cancer and prediction of clinical outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 441–7.

Hsieh CH, ChangChien CC, Lin H, Huang EY, Huang CC, Lan KC, Chang SY. Can a preoperative CA 125 level be a criterion for full pelvic lymphadenectomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer? Gynecol Oncol 2002; 86: 28–33.

Takač I, Bali R, Čas Sikošek N, Gorišek B, Zukanović D. Correlation of serum CA 125 levels and lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003; 13: Suppl. 1: 26–7.

Ginath S, Menczer J, Fintsi Y, Ben-Shem E, Glezerman M, Avinoach I. Tissue and serum CA 125 expression in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002; 12: 372–5.

Kim YB, Niloff JM. Endometrial carcinoma: Analysis of recurrence in patients treated with a strategy minimizing lymph node sampling and radiation therapy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 175–80.

Chuang L, Burke WT, Tornos C, Marino BD et al. Staging laparotomy for endometrial carcinoma: Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 58: 189–93.

Stržinar V, Baškovič M, Bebar S et al. Ginekološki malignomi. Doktrina zdravljenja ginekoloških malignomov na Onkološkem inštitutu in univerzitetni ginekološki kliniki. Ljubljana: Zveza slovenskih društev za boj proti raku Ljubljana, 2002: 17.

Berclaz G, Hanggi W, Kratzer-Berger A, Altermatt HJ, Greiner RH, Dreher E. Lymphadenectomy in high risk endometrial carcinoma stage I and II: no more morbidity and no need for external pelvic radiation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1999; 9: 322–8.

Fanning J, Firestein S. Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of complete lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998; 8: 270–3.

Petereit DG. Complete surgical staging in endometrial cancer provides prognostic information only. Semin Rad Oncol 2000; 10: 8–14.

Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD, Austin MJ, Shingleton HM, Noojin F, Conner W. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: Survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node biopsies. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 56: 29–33.

Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Mutuzani K, Yokota H, Nagano H, Ozaki Y, Murukani A, Veda K, Taketani Y. Treatment of node positive endometrial cancer with complete node dissection, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Br J Cancer 1977; 75: 1836–41.

McMeekin DS, Lashbrook D, Gold M, Scribner DR, Kamelle S, Tillmanns TD, Mannel R. Nodal distribution and its significance in FIGO stage IIIc endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82: 375–9.

Mohan DS, Samuels MA, Selim MA, Shalodi AD, Ellis RJ, Samuels JR, Yun HJ. Long-term outcomes of therapeutic pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 70: 165–71.

Nelson G, Randall M, Sutton G, Moore D, Hurteau J, Look K. FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma with metastases confined to pelvic lymph nodes: analysis of treatment outcomes, prognostic variables, and failure patterns following adjuvant radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 75: 211–4.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 72 (2003): Supplement II

Section

Review

License


The Author transfers to the Publisher (Slovenian Medical Association) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.

The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory

The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.

The Publisher (Slovenian Medical Association) has the right to transfer the rights of acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.

The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence. 

How to Cite

1.
THE ROLE OF LYMPHADENECTOMY IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER. ZdravVestn [Internet]. 2003 Dec. 19 [cited 2024 Nov. 2];72. Available from: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1963

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>