Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.2527Keywords:
venous thromboembolism, prophylaxis, medical patientsAbstract
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common unpredictable cause of in-hospital death. Despite the fact that VTE prophylaxis has been proven to be efficacious and safe it remains underused. The aim is to determine the use of VTE prophylaxis in patients admitted to medical wards of the Division of Internal Medicine of the University Medical Centre Ljubljana.
Methods: On a pre-specified day, all patients hospitalized on the wards of the Division of Internal Medicine were assessed for VTE risk by Padua prediction score. According to the risk of VTE and contraindications for pharmacological prophylaxis the adequacy of VTE prophylaxis was determined by trained data abstractors. Doctors responsible for the patients’ treatment were not aware of the study.
Results: 511 patients were enrolled (222 women and 289 men). VTE prophylaxis was not indicated in 245 patients; 17 (6.9 %) patients classified as being at low risk for VTE nevertheless received prophylaxis. A half of 266 (52.1 %) patients at high risk for VTE had a contraindication to pharmacological prophylaxis. In 133 at-risk patients without contraindications, VTE prophylaxis was prescribed correctly in 50 (37.6 %) patients, 11 (8.3 %) patients received wrong doses and 72 (52 %) at-risk patients did not receive any prophylaxis.
Conclusion: On the chosen day, VTE prophylaxis was appropriately used in 81 % of hospitalized patients on medical wards of the Division of Internal Medicine of the University Medical Centre Ljubljana. Since only 37 % of the patients at high risk for VTE received recommended VTE prophylaxis, our data reinforce the rationale to implement measures to improve these results.
Downloads
References
Heit JA, Ashrani A, Crusan DJ, McBane RD, Petterson TM, Bailey KR. Reasons for the persistent incidence of venous thromboembolism. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2016;117(2):390–400.
Heit JA. The Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism in the Community: Implications for Prevention and Management. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2006;21(1):23–9.
Sandler DA, Martin JF. Autopsy Proven Pulmonary Embolism in Hospital Patients: Are We Detecting Enough Deep Vein Thrombosis? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1989;82(4):203–5.
Anderson FA. The Prevalence of Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism Among Hospital Patients. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1992;152(8):1660.
Anderson FA. Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(90231):9I–16.
Leizorovicz A. Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Dalteparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Acutely Ill Medical Patients. Circulation. 2004;110(7):874–9.
Lloyd NS, Douketis JD, Moinuddin I, Lim W, Crowther MA. Anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2008;6(3):405–14.
Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AS, Cushman M, Dentali F, Akl EA, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e195S-e226S.
Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann J-F, Goldhaber SZ, Kakkar AK, Deslandes B, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. The Lancet. 2008;371(9610):387–94.
de Lorenzo-Pinto A, García-Sánchez R, Pascual Izquierdo C, Durán-García ME, Castuera-Gil AI, Andueza-Lillo JA, et al. Impact of the endorse study results on thromboprophylaxis prescribing patterns in medical patients attending the Emergency Department. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2014;69(1):81–6.
Rossetto V, Barbar S, Vedovetto V, Milan M, Prandoni P. Physicians’ compliance with the Padua Prediction Score for preventing venous thromboembolism among hospitalized medical patients. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2013;11(7):1428–30.
Nieto JA, Cámara T, Camacho I. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients. A retrospective multicenter study. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2014;25(8):717–23.
Kahn SR, Morrison DR, Emed J, Tagalakis V, Shrier I. Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010.
Roy P-M, Rachas A, Meyer G, Le Gal G, Durieux P, El Kouri D, et al. Multifaceted Intervention to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Medical Illness: A Multicenter Cluster-Randomized Trial. PloS one. 2016;11(5):e0154832.
Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V, Ferrari A, Brandolin B, Perlati M, et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2010;8(11):2450–7.
Decousus H, Tapson VF, Bergmann J-F, Chong BH, Froehlich JB, Kakkar AK, et al. Factors at Admission Associated With Bleeding Risk in Medical Patients. Chest. 2011;139(1):69–79.
Wickham N, Gallus AS, Walters BNJ, Wilson A. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to Australian hospitals: summary of National Health and Medical Research Council clinical practice guideline. Internal Medicine Journal. 2012;42(6):698–708.
Mavri A, Vene N, eds. Smernice za vodenje antikoagulacijskega zdravljenja. 2. izd. Ljubljana: Slovensko zdravniško društvo, Sekcija za antikoagulacijsko zdravljenje in preprečevanje trombemboličnih bolezni pri Združenju za žilne bolezni; 2009.
Musial J, Sydor WJ. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting–results of the ENDORSE study in Poland. Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej. 2008;118(10):555–61.
Losonczy H, Tar A. Results of ENDORSE study in Hungary. Multinational, cross-sectional study to assess the prevalence of venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in acute hospital care setting. Orvosi Hetilap. 2008;149(44):2069–76.
Zotz R, Kauschat-Brüning D, Bramlage P. Thromboembolierisiko und -prophylaxe internistischer und chirurgischer Patienten im Krankenhaus. DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. 2009;134(43):2163–9.
Chopard P, DÖRffler-Melly J, Hess U, Wuillemin WA, Hayoz D, Gallino A, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients: definite need for improvement. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2005;257(4):352–7.
Alckmin CA, Garcia MD, Bricola SA, Martins MA, Lichtenstein A, Paiva EF. Venous thromboembolism risk assessment in hospitalised patients: A new proposal. Clinics. 2013;68(11):1416–20.
Kahn SR, Panju A, Geerts W, Pineo GF, Desjardins L, Turpie AGG, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients in Canada. Thrombosis Research. 2007;119(2):145–55.
La Regina M, Orlandini F, Marchini F, Marinaro A, Bonacci R, Bonanni P, et al. Combined assessment of thrombotic and haemorrhagic risk in acute medical patients. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2015;115(2):392–8.
Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V, Ferrari A, Brandolin B, Perlati M, et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2010;8(11):2450–7.
Germini F, Agnelli G, Fedele M, Galli MG, Giustozzi M, Marcucci M, et al. Padua prediction score or clinical judgment for decision making on antithrombotic prophylaxis: a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2016;42(3):336–9.
Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, Cooper JM, Paterno MD, Soukonnikov B, et al. Electronic Alerts to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism among Hospitalized Patients. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352(10):969–77.
Gibbs H, Fletcher J, Blombery P, Collins R, Wheatley D. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit. Thrombosis Journal. 2011;9(1):7.
Rashid ST, Thursz MR, Razvi NA, Voller R, Orchard T, Rashid ST, et al. Venous Thromboprophylaxis in Uk Medical Inpatients. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2005;98(11):507–12.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Slovenian Medical Association) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Slovenian Medical Association) has the right to transfer the rights of acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
