The efficacy of an interscalene brachial plexus block in relieving postoperative pain after an arthroscopic rotatory cuff reconstruction
Retrospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.2917Keywords:
arthroscopic rotatory cuff reconstruction, shoulder surgery anesthesia, regional anesthesia, postoperative pain, interscalene brachial plexus block, postoperative analgesiaAbstract
Background: Rotator cuff tears are among the most common causes for an arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Movement of the limb is essential for successful recovery and paramount for well controlled postoperative pain (POP). The efficacy of the interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) in relieving POP in homecare setting was evaluated. The research is expected to call our attention to the shortcomings of ISB and point out a possible need to adjust the prescribed oral analgesic therapy.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 150 patients was conducted. They had all undergone arthroscopic shoulder surgery due to the rotator cuff tear and received 12–30 mL levobupivacaine with dexamethasone preoperatively with ultrasound-guided ISB. POP was assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients’ demographical and clinical features were assessed as well as the duration of ISB and the analgesics consumption. VAS values were analysed 90 hours after surgery at rest and on movement. Patients’ satisfaction was assessed as well. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for comparison of the VAS values between descriptive variables. In the analysis of different levels of POP within the same patient, Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The mean duration of ISB effect was 24–36 hours. In total, 77 additional doses of opioids and 104 doses of non-opioid analgesics were required during the first three post-operative days (POD). The median VAS value of the early POP was 0, both at rest and on movement. POP was 0.5 on movement and 1 at rest on the first POD, 2 and 3 on the second POD, 2 and 2 on the third POD. No significant differences were found between POP on movement and at rest (p > 0.05; Repeated Measures ANOVA). Most patients had been comfortable during surgery as well as later on the ward and at home.
Conclusion: ISB is effective in relieving POP after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in home care after hospital discharge. It provides more than 24-hour analgesia, but can cause intra-operative haemodynamic instability. The prescribed analgesic therapy is efficient. VAS values are satisfactory at rest and on movement. ISB is safe, uncomplicated and reliable in addition to high patients’ satisfaction. We conclude that ISB is the most appropriate method for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Downloads
References
1. Greenberg DL. Evaluation and treatment of shoulder pain. Med Clin North Am. 2014;98(3):487-504.
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.01.016
PMID: 24758957
2. Arndt J, Clavert P, Mielcarek P, Bouchaib J, Meyer N, Kempf JF; French Society for Shoulder & Elbow (SOFEC). Immediate passive motion versus immobilization after endoscopic supraspinatus tendon repair: a prospective randomized study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(6):S131-8.
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.05.003
PMID: 22944392
3. Thakkar RS, Thakkar SC, Srikumaran U, McFarland EG, Fayad LM. Complications of rotator cuff surgery-the role of post-operative imaging in patient care. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1039):20130630.
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130630
PMID: 24734935
4. Paxton ES, Backus J, Keener J, Brophy RH. Shoulder arthroscopy: basic principles of positioning, anesthesia, and portal anatomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(6):332-42.
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-06-332
PMID: 23728958
5. Meissner W, Coluzzi F, Fletcher D, Huygen F, Morlion B, Neugebauer E, et al. Improving the management of post-operative acute pain: priorities for change. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(11):2131-43.
DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1092122
PMID: 26359332
6. Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(4):934-44.
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3
PMID: 23392233
7. Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(2):534-40.
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E
PMID: 12873949
8. Gramke HF, de Rijke JM, van Kleef M, Kessels AG, Peters ML, Sommer M, et al. Predictive factors of postoperative pain after day-case surgery. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(6):455-60.
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819a6e34
PMID: 19542791
9. Maga JM, Cooper L, Gebhard RE. Outpatient regional anesthesia for upper extremity surgery update (2005 to present) distal to shoulder. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;50(1):47-55.
DOI: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31821a00a8
PMID: 22227422
10. Tran DQ, Elgueta MF, Aliste J, Finlayson RJ. Diaphragm-Sparing Nerve Blocks for Shoulder Surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(1):32-8.
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000529
PMID: 27941477
11. Beecroft CL, Coventry DM. Anaesthesia for shoulder surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2008;8(6):193-8.
DOI: 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn040
12. Russon KE, Herrick MJ, Moriggl B, Messner HJ, Dixon A, Harrop-Griffiths W, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus block: assessment of the needle angle needed to enter the spinal canal. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(1):43-5.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05685.x
PMID: 19087005
13. Stessel B, Boon M, Joosten EA, Ory JP, Evers S, van Kuijk SM, et al. Metamizole versus ibuprofen at home after day surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):471.
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1586-8
PMID: 27669689
14. Wilson AT, Nicholson E, Burton L, Wild C. Analgesia for day-case shoulder surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(3):414-5.
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh071
PMID: 14742335
15. Ead H. From Aldrete to PADSS: reviewing discharge criteria after ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 2006;21(4):259-67.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2006.05.006
PMID: 16935737
16. Kersten P, Küçükdeveci AA, Tennant A. The use of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(7):609-10.
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0999
PMID: 22674245
17. Dexter F, Chestnut DH. Analysis of statistical tests to compare visual analog scale measurements among groups. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(4):896-902.
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199504000-00012
PMID: 7717561
18. Gerbershagen HJ, Rothaug J, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Determination of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain on the numeric rating scale: a cut-off point analysis applying four different methods. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(4):619-26.
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer195
PMID: 21724620
19. Aksu R, Biçer C, Ülgey A, Bayram A, Güneş I, Güney A, et al. Comparison of interscalene brachial plexus block and intra-articular local anesthetic administration on postoperative pain management in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Braz J Anesthesiol Engl Ed. 2015;65(3):222-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.06.005
PMID: 25925036
20. Delaunay L, Souron V, Lafosse L, Marret E, Toussaint B. Analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: subacromial versus interscalene continuous infusion of ropivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30(2):117-22.
DOI: 10.1097/00115550-200503000-00001
PMID: 15765452
21. Hussain N, Goldar G, Ragina N, Banfield L, Laffey JG, Abdallah FW. Suprascapular and Interscalene Nerve Block for Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2017;127(6):998-1013.
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001894
PMID: 28968280
22. Abdallah FW, Halpern SH, Aoyama K, Brull R. Will the Real Benefits of Single-Shot Interscalene Block Please Stand Up? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(5):1114-29.
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000688
PMID: 25822923
23. Kessler J, Marhofer P, Hopkins PM, Hollmann MW. Peripheral regional anaesthesia and outcome: lessons learned from the last 10 years. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114(5):728-45.
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu559
PMID: 25690833
24. Fermont AJ, Wolterbeek N, Wessel RN, Baeyens JP, de Bie RA. Prognostic factors for successful recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic literature review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(3):153-63.
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4832
PMID: 24450368
25. Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G. Anaesthesia for shoulder surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2002;16(2):211-25.
DOI: 10.1053/bean.2002.0234
PMID: 12491553
26. Li A, Wei Z, Liu Y, Shi J, Ding H, Tang H, et al. Ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine in peripheral nerve block: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(14):e6551.
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006551
PMID: 28383425
27. Gautier P, Vandepitte C, Ramquet C, DeCoopman M, Xu D, Hadzic A. The minimum effective anesthetic volume of 0.75% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(4):951-5.
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822b876f
PMID: 21821517
28. Halaszynski TM. Ultrasound brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia for upper extremity surgery: essentials of our current understanding, 2011. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24(5):581-91.
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834aca03
PMID: 21897215
29. Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Dahl JB. Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade of the upper extremity. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012;25(2):253-9.
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835069c2
PMID: 22246462
30. Desmet M, Braems H, Reynvoet M, Plasschaert S, Van Cauwelaert J, Pottel H, et al. I.V. and perineural dexamethasone are equivalent in increasing the analgesic duration of a single-shot interscalene block with ropivacaine for shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(3):445-52.
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet109
PMID: 23587875
31. Fredrickson MJ, Abeysekera A, White R. Randomized study of the effect of local anesthetic volume and concentration on the duration of peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37(5):495-501.
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182580fd0
PMID: 22664978
32. Cummings KC, Napierkowski DE, Parra-Sanchez I, Kurz A, Dalton JE, Brems JJ, et al. Effect of dexamethasone on the duration of interscalene nerve blocks with ropivacaine or bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(3):446-53.
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer159
PMID: 21676892
33. Baeriswyl M, Kirkham KR, Jacot-Guillarmod A, Albrecht E. Efficacy of perineural vs systemic dexamethasone to prolong analgesia after peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(2):183-91.
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex191
PMID: 28854551
34. Marhofer P, Columb M, Hopkins PM, Greher M, Marhofer D, Levi Bienzle MR, et al. Dexamethasone as an adjuvant for peripheral nerve blockade: a randomised, triple-blinded crossover study in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(4):525-31.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.004
PMID: 30857609
35. Heesen M, Klimek M, Imberger G, Hoeks SE, Rossaint R, Straube S. Co-administration of dexamethasone with peripheral nerve block: intravenous vs perineural application: systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression and trial-sequential analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(2):212-27.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.062
PMID: 29406171
36. Orebaugh SL, Williams BA, Kentor ML, Bolland MA, Mosier SK, Nowak TP. Interscalene block using ultrasound guidance: impact of experience on resident performance. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(10):1268-74.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02048.x
PMID: 19594465
37. Tandoc MN, Fan L, Kolesnikov S, Kruglov A, Nader ND. Adjuvant dexamethasone with bupivacaine prolongs the duration of interscalene block: a prospective randomized trial. J Anesth. 2011;25(5):704-9.
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-011-1180-x
PMID: 21681533
38. Ikemoto RY, Murachovsky J, Prata Nascimento LG, Bueno RS, Oliveira Almeida LH, Strose E, et al. Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Two Anesthetic Methods For Shoulder Surgery. Rev Bras Ortop Engl Ed. 2010;45(4):395-9.
DOI: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30386-4
PMID: 27022569
39. Shin SW, Byeon GJ, Yoon JU, Ok YM, Baek SH, Kim KH, et al. Effective analgesia with ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Anesth. 2014;28(1):64-9.
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-013-1681-x
PMID: 23903900
40. Lee JJ, Kim DY, Hwang JT, Lee SS, Hwang SM, Kim GH, et al. Effect of ultrasonographically guided axillary nerve block combined with suprascapular nerve block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(8):906-14.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.014
PMID: 24880194
41. Desroches A, Klouche S, Schlur C, Bauer T, Waitzenegger T, Hardy P. Suprascapular nerve block versus interscalene block as analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(11):2203-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.013
PMID: 27177436
42. Thomas LC, Graham SK, Osteen KD, Porter HS, Nossaman BD. Comparison of ultrasound and nerve stimulation techniques for interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery in a residency training environment: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded trial. Ochsner J. 2011;11(3):246-52.
PMID: 21960758
43. Salviz EA, Xu D, Frulla A, Kwofie K, Shastri U, Chen J, et al. Continuous interscalene block in patients having outpatient rotator cuff repair surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(6):1485-92.
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000436607.40643.0a
PMID: 24257398
44. Fredrickson MJ, Krishnan S, Chen CY. Postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery: a critical appraisal and review of current techniques. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(6):608-24.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06231.x
PMID: 20565394
45. Klein SM, Grant SA, Greengrass RA, Nielsen KC, Speer KP, White W, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus block with a continuous catheter insertion system and a disposable infusion pump. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(6):1473-8.
DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200012000-00033
PMID: 11094003
46. Malik T, Mass D, Cohn S. Postoperative Analgesia in a Prolonged Continuous Interscalene Block Versus Single-Shot Block in Outpatient Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Study. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(8):1544-1550.e1.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.044
PMID: 27107906
47. Uquillas CA, Capogna BM, Rossy WH, Mahure SA, Rokito AS. Postoperative pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(7):1204-13.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.026
PMID: 27079219
48. Ling W, Mooney L, Hillhouse M. Prescription opioid abuse, pain and addiction: clinical issues and implications. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011;30(3):300-5.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00271.x
PMID: 21545561
49. Lee SM, Park SE, Nam YS, Han SH, Lee KJ, Kwon MJ, et al. Analgesic effectiveness of nerve block in shoulder arthroscopy: comparison between interscalene, suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(12):2573-8.
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1950-5
PMID: 22434159
50. Kumara AB, Gogia AR, Bajaj JK, Agarwal N. Clinical evaluation of post-operative analgesia comparing suprascapular nerve block and interscalene brachial plexus block in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016;7(1):34-9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2015.09.003
PMID: 26908974
51. Aida S, Fujihara H, Taga K, Fukuda S, Shimoji K. Involvement of presurgical pain in preemptive analgesia for orthopedic surgery: a randomized double blind study. Pain. 2000;84(2-3):169-73.
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00196-7
PMID: 10666521
52. Lovich-Sapola J, Smith CE, Brandt CP. Postoperative pain control. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95(2):301-18.
DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.10.002
PMID: 25814108
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Slovenian Medical Association) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Slovenian Medical Association) has the right to transfer the rights of acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
