THREE-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND IN GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Keywords:
sonography, three-dimensional, gynecologic oncologyAbstract
Background. Although three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) imaging has been used for a decade, debate continues about its potential clinical aplications in gynecology. The same is true for the field of gynecologic oncology. Also, reports regarding usfulness of 3D US in gynecologic oncology are limited. A few potentially useful clinical applications have been described and some of these are now gaining general acceptance. In this paper, the usfulness of 3D US in the main areas of its application is demonstrated: diagnostics of cervical, endometrial, ovarian and breast cancer.
Conclusions. An important advantage of 3D US over conventional two-dimensional imaging is the ability to reconstruct and display any arbitrarily chosen section within the volume dataset as well as ability to measure the volume of pelvic organs regardless of their shape. 3D US also allows the realtime analysis of the acquired image data to be conducted at a later time when the patient is off the examination table.
Downloads
References
Feichtinger W. Transvaginal three-dimensional imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 375–8.
Jurkovic D. Three-dimensional ultrasound in gynecology: a critical evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 109–17.
Chou CY, Hsu KF, Wang ST, Huang SC, Tzeng CC, Huang KE. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in volume estimation of cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 66: 89–93.
Suren A, Osmers R, Kuhn W. 3D Color Power Angio imaging: a new method to assess intracervical vascularisation in benign and pathological conditions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11:133–7.
Gruboeck K, Jurkovic D, Lawton F, Savvas M, Tailor A, Campbell S. The diagnostic value of endometrial thickness and volume measurements by three-dimensional ultrasound in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 272–6.
Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Osborne NG. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 59: 129–35.
Hata T, Yanagihara T, Hayashi K, Yamashiro C, Ohnishi Y, Akiyama M, Manabe A, Miyazaki K. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian tumors: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod 1999: 858–61.
Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Anic T, Kosuta D. Three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler improve the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 76: 28–32.
Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Sparac V, Kosuta D. Three-dimensional ultrsonographic and power Doppler characterization of ovarian lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 365–71.
Kupesic S, Kurjak A. Contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional power Doppler sonography for differentiation of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 452–8.
Šparac V, Kupešić S, Kurjak A. What do contrast media add to threedimensional power Doppler evaluation of adnexal masses? Croat Med J 2000; 41: 257–61.
Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Hull A, Riccabona M, Sklansky MS, James G. Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 374–83.
Campbell S. The potential diagnostic capabilities of three-dimensional surface rendering. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 148.
Alcazar JL, Garcia-Manero M. Three-dimensional sonographic morphologic assessment in complex adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 249–54.
Cohen LS, Escobar PF, Scharm C, Glimco B, Fishman DA. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer prediction. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82: 40–8.
Chan L, Lin WM, Uerpairojkit B, Hartman D, Reece A, Helm W. Evaluation of adnexal masses using three-dimensional ultrasonographic technology: preliminary report. J Ultrasound Med 1997; 16: 349–54.
Surry KJ, Smith WL, Campbell LJ, Mills GR, Downey DB, Fenster A. The development and evaluation of a three-dimensional ultrasound-guided breast biopsy apparatus. Med Image Anal 2002; 6: 301–12.
Baez E, Huber A, Vetter M, Hackeloer BJ. Minimal invasive complete excision of benign breast tumors using a three-dimensional ultrasoundguided mammotome vacuum device. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 267–72.
Schwartzberg BS, Goates JJ, Keeler SA, Moore JA. Use of advanced breast biopsy instrumentation while performing stereotactic breast biopsies: review of 150 consecutive biopsies. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191: 9–15.
Rotten D, Levaillant JM, Zerat L. Analysis of normal breast tissue and of solid breast masses using three-dimensional ultrasound mammography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 114–24.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
The Author transfers to the Publisher (Slovenian Medical Association) all economic copyrights following form Article 22 of the Slovene Copyright and Related Rights Act (ZASP), including the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, the rental right, the right of public performance, the right of public transmission, the right of public communication by means of phonograms and videograms, the right of public presentation, the right of broadcasting, the right of rebroadcasting, the right of secondary broadcasting, the right of communication to the public, the right of transformation, the right of audiovisual adaptation and all other rights of the author according to ZASP.
The aforementioned rights are transferred non-exclusively, for an unlimited number of editions, for the term of the statutory
The Author can make use of his work himself or transfer subjective rights to others only after 3 months from date of first publishing in the journal Zdravniški vestnik/Slovenian Medical Journal.
The Publisher (Slovenian Medical Association) has the right to transfer the rights of acquired parties without explicit consent of the Author.
The Author consents that the Article be published under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 (attribution-non-commercial) or comparable licence.
